Software Alternatives & Startups

Redaxa VS ShellNewHandler

Compare Redaxa VS ShellNewHandler and see what are their differences

Redaxa

Review a prompt before you paste it into AI. Redact possible personal data and secrets; check public GitHub repositories. Free extension checks run on-device; web checks use Redaxa servers.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial €7.99 / Monthly (Pro)
ShellNewHandler

SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 2
Developer Tools popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Redaxa
ShellNewHandler
Website redaxa.getcertsprint.com sourceforge.net
Pricing
Freemium Free trial €7.99 / Monthly (Pro) Official pricing
—
Platforms
Windows Web Google Chrome
—
Listed in

About Redaxa and ShellNewHandler

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Redaxa
ShellNewHandler

Before you paste, review what goes with it. Redaxa flags possible personal details, credentials and protected terms, then gives you a redacted copy to inspect before sharing. Detection can miss sensitive information or flag harmless text: review every result. Choose where checks run. Free...

Read more about Redaxa

No description of ShellNewHandler yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Redaxa 3 features
ShellNewHandler 0 features
  • Prompt review
    Review personal details, credentials and financial information before sharing text with an AI provider.
  • Sensitive data redaction
    Free extension prompt checks run locally; web, Windows and Pro extension checks use Redaxa servers.
  • Repository checks
    Pro and Business Windows app: local checks for possible exposed credentials with redacted reports.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Redaxa
ShellNewHandler

No analysis of Redaxa yet.

Overall verdict

  • ShellNewHandler is a niche, lightweight utility hosted on SourceForge designed to give users more control over the Windows 'New' context menu (the ShellNew menu). It can be considered good for its specific narrow use case, but it is an older, minimally maintained tool that may not suit all users, especially those on modern Windows versions.

Why this product is good

  • Provides direct control over customizing the Windows right-click 'New' menu, allowing users to add or remove file type entries
  • Lightweight and free, without bundled bloatware typical of some other free utilities
  • Simple and focused in scope, making it easy to understand for its specific purpose
  • Open distribution via SourceForge allows transparency and no-cost access

Recommended for

  • Power users who want to declutter or customize the Windows New context menu
  • IT administrators managing standardized desktop environments across multiple machines
  • Users comfortable with older utility-style tools and Windows registry-related tweaks
  • Not recommended for casual users seeking modern, actively supported software with regular updates

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Redaxa
ShellNewHandler
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Redaxa and ShellNewHandler.

What's the story behind your product?

Redaxa's answer

I develop and maintain Redaxa, formerly known as PromptShield. It focuses on a practical step in AI-assisted work: reviewing sensitive text before sharing it. Prompt checks are available on the web, Windows and Chrome; paid Windows plans also include local repository checks. Public release notes document changes and limitations. Redaxa is proprietary software, not an open-source project.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Redaxa's answer

Redaxa is designed for independent developers, freelancers and small teams who work with AI tools and may need to review client details, credentials or other sensitive text before sharing it.

The Windows repository checks are aimed at developers who want a local review of possible exposed secrets before sharing code. This describes the intended audience, not a list of existing customers. Redaxa complements careful review; it does not replace an organization’s security policies or a full security audit.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Redaxa's answer

Choose Redaxa if your immediate need is to review sensitive text before sharing it with an AI tool, with optional local repository checks in the paid Windows plans. You can start with the free prompt workflow and assess whether it fits your day-to-day work before upgrading.

The important distinction is scope: Free Chrome prompt checks run on the device without a daily limit. Web and Windows prompt checks use Redaxa servers, with five free checks per day; Pro Chrome checks also use the server. The web repository checker accepts public GitHub repositories only, while Windows Pro repository checks run locally. Redaxa is not a replacement for enterprise data-loss prevention, continuous organization-wide secret monitoring or a full security audit. Compare those requirements before choosing a tool.

What makes your product unique?

Redaxa's answer

I develop Redaxa. It brings two related review tasks into one product: checking text before sharing it with an AI provider, and reviewing repositories for possible exposed credentials in the Windows app.

Prompt checks are available on the web, Windows and Chrome. Free Chrome checks run on the device without a daily limit. Web and Windows checks use Redaxa servers and allow five free prompt checks per day; Pro Chrome checks also use the server. Prompt text is discarded after analysis. Repository checks are included with Pro and Business on Windows and run locally, with prioritized findings and redacted reports.

The goal is a clearer review before sharing, not a promise that every secret or vulnerability will be detected. Always inspect the result.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Redaxa's answer

TypeScript and JavaScript power the web interface and shared detection logic. The Windows desktop app uses Tauri 2 with Rust, and the Chrome extension uses Manifest V3. Subscription payments are handled through Stripe. Free Chrome prompt checks run on the device. Web and Windows prompt checks and Pro Chrome checks use Redaxa's backend; repository checks in the paid Windows plans run locally.

User comments

Share your experience with using Redaxa and ShellNewHandler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Redaxa 0 mentions
ShellNewHandler 2 mentions

Tracking Redaxa since Sep 2026.

  • I recently got libreoffice, but now the new option in right click looks like a mess. Can someone help me get rid of them please?
    Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
  • This menu should be easy to add/remove programs to... Who is really creating Access Databases from this menu often enough to keep it here? (Not me!) Is there an easy way to edit this?
    I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago

Alternatives to Redaxa and ShellNewHandler

When comparing Redaxa and ShellNewHandler, you can also consider the following products.