Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Red Hat Directory Server VS Apache Fortress

Compare Red Hat Directory Server VS Apache Fortress and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Red Hat Directory Server logo Red Hat Directory Server

An LDAP-based directory that makes it easier to manage user access to multiple systems.

Apache Fortress logo Apache Fortress

Cloud Identity and Access Management
  • Red Hat Directory Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17
  • Apache Fortress Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-17

Red Hat Directory Server features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Apache Fortress features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache Fortress is open-source, which means it's free to use and has a supportive community for maintenance and improvement.
  • Flexibility
    The system is highly flexible, allowing customization and integration with various LDAP directory services for improved user access management.
  • RBAC Support
    Apache Fortress provides Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), which is crucial for effectively managing user permissions and maintaining security compliance.
  • Scalability
    Designed to scale efficiently, it can handle a large number of users and permissions without a decrease in performance.
  • Compliance and Security
    Offers features for auditing, monitoring, and ensuring compliance with security standards.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Fortress

  • Complex Configuration
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, requiring a deeper understanding of LDAP and access management concepts.
  • Limited Documentation
    Although extensive, the documentation can sometimes be hard to navigate, making it difficult for new users to find specific information.
  • Specific Use Case
    Best suited for organizations that already utilize LDAP directories, potentially limiting its applicability for those who do not.
  • Dependency Management
    Requires consistent management of dependencies and updates, which can be time-consuming and complex.
  • Community-driven Support
    Primarily supported by a community rather than a dedicated helpdesk, which may result in slower response times to user issues.

Red Hat Directory Server videos

+ Add

DevOps & SysAdmins: Red Hat Directory Server and 389 Directory Server, differences

Apache Fortress videos

No Apache Fortress videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Red Hat Directory Server and Apache Fortress)

Red Hat Directory Server

Apache Fortress

Identity And Access Management
50 50%
Identity And Access Management
50% 50
Identity Provider
54 54%
Identity Provider
46% 46
Monitoring Tools
49 49%
Monitoring Tools
51% 51
SSO
41 41%
SSO
59% 59

User comments

Share your experience with using Red Hat Directory Server and Apache Fortress. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Red Hat Directory Server and Apache Fortress, you can also consider the following products

JumpCloud - Cloud-based directory services. Alternative to Microsoft Active Directory.

Okta - Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices

Oracle Identity Manager - Oracle Identity Management enables oganizations to effectively manage the end-to-end lifecycle of user identities across all enterprise resources.

OneLogin - On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more

AWS Directory Service - Directory Service from Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Secret Double Octopus - Passwordless Authentication solution for the Enterprise offers unified access across all enterprise resources, on-premise, remote access, desktop and cloud applications.

Loading...