RecurFix VS ShellNewHandler

RecurFix's answer

Most businesses lose 5–15% of MRR every month to silently failed renewals, and neither Mollie nor Stripe recovers these intelligently on their own. RecurFix fills that gap with AI-optimized retries, localized dunning emails, hosted recovery pages, and automatic mandate repair — chosen per-failure, not a fixed playbook.

What sets it apart:

• Multi-provider - works across both Mollie and Stripe, not locked to one PSP
• Fast setup - connects in 5 minutes with no code changes
• Smarter over time - AI engine improves from millions of recovery signals, with manual control when needed
• Flat pricing - from €19/month, no revenue share
• Full visibility - analytics dashboard shows the entire recovery funnel

RecurFix's answer

RecurFix's primary audience is subscription-based businesses using Mollie or Stripe for recurring billing who are losing revenue to failed renewals. This spans:

• SaaS companies with monthly or annual subscription plans
• Subscription ecommerce businesses (subscription boxes, replenishment products) on platforms like WooCommerce or Shopify
• Membership and community platforms with recurring membership fees
• Digital agencies managing recurring billing/retainers across multiple clients
• Businesses with custom billing systems built on Mollie or Stripe who want recovery via API without rebuilding billing logic

Most fit the profile of EU and global subscription businesses (using SEPA, iDEAL, Bancontact, cards, or ACH) that are small to mid-sized — the kind of company where 5–15% of MRR lost to silent payment failures is a meaningful, recoverable amount, and that wants this fixed in minutes without engineering work.

RecurFix's answer

RecurFix was built around one observation: every subscription business faces the same silent problem - recurring payments fail, customers lose access, and revenue disappears, with no automated recovery mechanism in place.

Payment providers like Mollie and Stripe deliver world-class transaction infrastructure, but intelligent recovery - smart retries, dunning emails, recovery pages, mandate repair - isn't their core focus. RecurFix was built specifically to fill that gap, not as a generic payment tool, but as a system engineered around the actual mechanics of Mollie mandates and Stripe Billing.

The guiding principle behind every feature: "Revenue you already earned should not disappear because of a temporary payment failure." That's the filter every feature is built against - if it doesn't directly help recover already-earned revenue, it doesn't ship.

RecurFix's answer

RecurFix is built as a dedicated recovery layer on top of payment providers, not a billing platform itself. A few things make it unique:

• Multi-provider by design - supports both Mollie and Stripe today (more planned), so businesses aren't locked into one PSP's limited retry logic
• Per-failure AI decisioning - instead of a fixed Day 1/Day 7 playbook, it analyzes failure type, payment method, customer history, and timing to choose the optimal retry, dunning, recovery page, or mandate repair for each specific case
• Mandate repair built in - automatically fixes broken SEPA/direct debit mandates and expired cards, not just retries the charge
• No code changes - integrates in about 5 minutes without touching existing billing infrastructure
• Flat pricing, no revenue share - plans start at €19/month, so RecurFix doesn't take a cut of recovered revenue like many competitors do
• Full recovery funnel visibility - a dashboard tracks every stage from failure detected through retried, emailed, and recovered

RecurFix's answer

RecurFix doesn't publicly name specific customers or logos at this stage. Customer testimonials on the site come from subscription businesses across Europe, including a SaaS analytics founder in the Netherlands, a subscription beauty box owner in Belgium, and a digital agency in the Netherlands managing billing for multiple clients on Mollie and Stripe.