
HackerRank
hackattic
Takehome
Adaface
Daily Coding Problem
Coderslang
Challenge Hunt
Real-life coding skill challenge

Exercise dataset for fitness apps: transparent background, animations, no subscription

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | real.dev | repdb.co |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Real Dev yet.
RepDB is a one-time-purchase exercise dataset with animations for developers building fitness and workout apps — not a subscription, not a rate-limited API. You download the data once and own it: JSON (and SQLite on the higher tier), WebP images, and full EN/DE/ES translations, with no...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Real Dev and RepDB.
RepDB's answer:
RepDB is sold as a one-time download, not a metered API — you own the JSON/SQLite data and WebP images outright, with no rate limits, no per-request billing, and no risk of the vendor cutting off access. It's also the only dataset in this space with EN/DE/ES translations, transparent (alpha-channel) images with no watermark, muscle-group highlighting, safety/goal tags, and looping animations on the higher tier.
RepDB's answer:
RepDB grew out of a consumer workout app its creator was building solo. Sourcing exercise images and data meant either paying for a subscription API with usage caps and no caching rights, or producing everything from scratch. The illustrated, multi-language dataset was built for us first, then split out as its own product once it became clear other indie developers had the same problem and preferred to buy the data outright rather than rent it through an API.
RepDB's answer:
Most alternatives are subscription APIs — you pay monthly, you're capped on requests, and ExerciseDB's terms of use explicitly forbid caching or storing the data at all, so every image render is a live paid API call. RepDB is the opposite: pay once, download the files, self-host with zero ongoing dependency. It's also the only option offering true DE/ES localization and transparent images instead of a white box behind every exercise.
RepDB's answer:
Solo developers and small teams building fitness or workout-tracking apps (iOS, Android, web) who need licensed exercise images and structured exercise data, but don't want to build their own media pipeline or depend on a rate-limited third-party API.
Share your experience with using Real Dev and RepDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
When comparing Real Dev and RepDB, you can also consider the following products.

HackerRank is a platform that allows companies to conduct interviews remotely to hire developers and for technical assessment purposes.
Compare HackerRank to Real Dev or RepDB:
Effective and humane coding challenges for candidates
Compare Takehome to Real Dev or RepDB:

Adaface offers an AI-powered method to automate first-round tech interviews and evaluate candidates for technical roles. Every Adaface assessment is tailored to each job description, to test for the skills that are essential to the job.
Compare Adaface to Real Dev or RepDB:

Get exceptionally good at coding interviews
Compare Daily Coding Problem to Real Dev or RepDB:
