Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ReadyAPI Performance VS Froglogic Squish

Compare ReadyAPI Performance VS Froglogic Squish and see what are their differences

ReadyAPI Performance logo ReadyAPI Performance

ReadyAPI Performance is a platform that offers Load Testing for REST and SOAP APIs, Microservices, and Databases.

Froglogic Squish logo Froglogic Squish

Squish is a commercial cross-platform GUI and regression testing tool that can test applications based on a variety of GUI technologies.
  • ReadyAPI Performance Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29
  • Froglogic Squish Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25

ReadyAPI Performance features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing
    ReadyAPI Performance offers extensive capabilities for testing APIs, including automated performance testing alongside functional, security, and virtualization within a single platform. This integration ensures thorough evaluation of API behavior under various conditions.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides an intuitive graphical interface, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical users for creating and executing performance tests without requiring advanced coding skills.
  • Integration with Popular CI/CD Tools
    ReadyAPI Performance seamlessly integrates with continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools like Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and Git, facilitating automated testing and accelerated development pipelines.
  • Real-Time Analytics and Reporting
    It offers real-time analytics and dynamic reporting features that provide immediate insights into performance bottlenecks and test results, helping teams make swift data-driven decisions.
  • Support for Multiple Protocols
    The tool supports a wide range of protocols such as REST, SOAP, GraphQL, and others, enabling comprehensive performance testing across diverse API types.

Possible disadvantages of ReadyAPI Performance

  • Cost
    ReadyAPI Performance can be expensive for small businesses or individual developers, as it is a commercial product with licensing fees that might not fit all budgets.
  • Resource Intensive
    The platform might require significant system resources for running extensive performance tests, which could impact other applications if not managed properly on less powerful machines.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While ReadyAPI Performance is designed to be user-friendly, leveraging its advanced features and integrations might require a deeper learning curve and familiarity with the environment.
  • Occasional Performance Issues
    Some users have reported that the application can suffer from lags or slow performance, particularly when handling very large datasets or executing complex test scenarios.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to open-source solutions, ReadyAPI Performance may have less community-driven support and resources, putting more reliance on official support and documentation provided by SmartBear.

Froglogic Squish features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Support
    Squish offers extensive cross-platform support for desktop, mobile, and embedded platforms, allowing for unified testing across different environments.
  • Wide Range of GUI Technologies
    Supports a variety of GUI technologies including Qt, QML, Java AWT/Swing, SWT/RCP, Windows MFC, .NET Windows Forms, WPF, iOS, Android, Web and more, which makes Squish versatile for many applications.
  • Powerful Scripting Capabilities
    Squish uses various scripting languages like Python, JavaScript, Perl, and Tcl, providing flexibility in writing and customizing test scripts.
  • Strong Object Recognition
    Features robust object recognition capabilities that can interact with complex UI elements reliably, which is critical for effective automated testing.
  • Integrated Test Development Environment
    Includes a powerful IDE for record, playback, and script editing, providing a user-friendly interface for developing and managing tests.

Possible disadvantages of Froglogic Squish

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, requiring a certain level of expertise to integrate into existing workflows.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its broad range of features and capabilities, new users might find it challenging to learn and require significant time to become proficient.
  • Cost
    Squish is a commercial tool with licensing fees that might be a concern for smaller teams or startups with limited budgets.
  • Performance Overhead
    Some users have reported performance overhead when running tests on larger applications, which could result in slower test execution times.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to open-source solutions, there may be less community support and fewer third-party resources available for troubleshooting and learning.

ReadyAPI Performance videos

No ReadyAPI Performance videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Froglogic Squish videos

Squish Candy Haul // Gummy Candy // Unboxing and Review

More videos:

  • Review - Real Drinks Versus Gummy Drinks Challenge (SQUISH CANDY REVIEW)!
  • Review - Squish-Dee-Lish Squishies Series 2 Full Box Opening Toy Review | PSToyReviews

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ReadyAPI Performance and Froglogic Squish)
Website Testing
62 62%
38% 38
Automated Testing
31 31%
69% 69
Online Services
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ReadyAPI Performance and Froglogic Squish. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ReadyAPI Performance and Froglogic Squish

ReadyAPI Performance Reviews

We have no reviews of ReadyAPI Performance yet.
Be the first one to post

Froglogic Squish Reviews

Best Selenium Alternatives (Free and Paid) in 2021
Graphical user interface (GUI) testing is the process of testing an applicationโ€™s visual elements. It is done to make sure all the visual features are behaving as expected. GUI Testing is mostly done by manual testers. Time consumption is very high due to manual testing. While conducting GUI Testing manually, we spend more time and money. To save a lot of time in the current...

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ReadyAPI Performance and Froglogic Squish, you can also consider the following products

DevTest - Test management solution for efficient quality assurance

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

dotCover - JetBrains dotCover is a .NET unit test runner and code coverage tool that integrates with Visual Studio.

Ranorex - Ranorex is a GUI test automation framework for testing of desktop, web-based and mobile applications.

QAComplete - Get award winning tools for all of your Software Quality needs and start improving your desktop and web applications today. Free trials are available for all.

QUnit - What is QUnit? QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!