GilFlow is smart cash flow management for individuals and teams — track income, expenses, subscriptions, and cash flow across every workspace, on the web and on Android.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, react-testing-library
seems to be a lot more popular than Splid.
While we know about 138 links to react-testing-library,
we've tracked only 2 mentions of Splid.
social mentions
138 vs 2
Developer Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
76 vs 146
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Focused on user-centric testing React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
Reduces coupling to implementation details By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
Improved test readability Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
Comprehensive query options The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
Active community and well-maintained React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.
Possible disadvantages
Limited support for non-DOM testing The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
Can be slower Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
Learning curve for traditional testers Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
Potential for less granular control Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
Dependencies on browser APIs The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.
User-Friendly Interface Splid offers an intuitive and easy-to-use interface that makes it simple for users to split expenses without any confusion.
Offline Functionality Users can log expenses and use the app even without an internet connection, which is useful in remote areas.
Multiple Currency Support Splid allows users to add expenses in different currencies, making it convenient for international travel and expenses.
No Sign-Up Required The app does not require users to create an account, simplifying access and reducing privacy concerns.
Easy Sharing Users can easily share expense reports with group members via a link, simplifying communication and transparency.
Possible disadvantages
Limited Integration Splid lacks integration with other financial apps or services, which can limit its functionality for some users.
Manual Expense Entry All expenses must be entered manually, which can be time-consuming compared to apps that offer receipt scanning.
No Real-Time Sync Changes are not updated in real-time across devices, potentially leading to discrepancies if multiple users are managing a list.
Basic Features Free While the basic app is free, advanced features require a paid upgrade, which might not be ideal for all users.
Limited to Group Expense Splid is focused on group expense sharing, lacking features for individual finance management or budgeting.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
react-testing-librarySplid
Overall verdict
React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. It’s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.
Why this product is good
React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.
Recommended for
Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code
Splid is an excellent app for those who want to take their bill splitting to the next level. It is among the popular bill splitting apps that supports advanced features like location-based payment suggestions,...
I prefer this app to similar ones I've tried. It seems clearer, more straightforward and simpler to use for normal holidays etc. But if you need more complex arrangements it's versatile too: in that you can...
Splitting up the cost of group trips can be tough. Splid allows you to add in all the expenses of a trip and then split it up among each person on the trip. The app is useful for splitting up non-trip expenses as...
Social recommendations and mentions
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
react-testing-library138 mentionsSplid2 mentions
Moving from Angular to React: A Practical Guide
Testing Library. React Testing Library. https://testing-library.com/docs/react-testing-library/intro/.
- Source: dev.to
/
about 1 month ago
Test-Driven Development for Building User Interfaces
React Testing Library’s core philosophy is that we should write our tests in such a way that we simulate user behavior. By testing what the user can actually do, our tests focus less on implementation details and more on the actual user...
- Source: dev.to
/
9 months ago
In the main branch, we set up Vitest as the test runner and React Testing Library for rendering the component and simulating user interactions. We also set up MSW to intercept the network requests and return mock responses.
- Source: dev.to
/
about 1 year ago
Splitwise is a free tool for friends and roommates to track bills and other shared expenses, so that everyone gets paid back. On the web, iPhone, and Android!
Compare Splitwise to react-testing-library or Splid:
Vitest
Jest
Enzyme
Storybook
Jasmine
React
Ava
