Software Alternatives & Startups

React Native Elements VS Ember-cli

Compare React Native Elements VS Ember-cli and see what are their differences

React Native Elements

Cross-platform React Native UI Toolkit

Rating
0 reviews
Ember-cli

Application and Data, Libraries, and JavaScript Framework Components

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Ember-cli seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
React Components popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

React Native Elements
E
Ember-cli
Website react-native-training.github.io cli.emberjs.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

React Native Elements 5 features
E
Ember-cli 5 features
  • Consistent Design
    React Native Elements provides a consistent design across different platforms by offering a set of highly customizable UI components that adhere to the material design and iOS design guidelines.
  • Ease of Use
    The library is beginner-friendly with a focus on ease of use, allowing developers to create high-quality UIs quickly and with minimal effort.
  • Customizable Components
    Components in React Native Elements are easily customizable with a rich set of props, allowing developers to tweak and modify them to fit the specific design requirements of their applications.
  • Rich Community Support
    Backed by a strong community and a dedicated team, React Native Elements offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support for resolving any issues or queries.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Built to support both iOS and Android, React Native Elements allows developers to build applications with a consistent look and feel across multiple platforms.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Advanced Components
    While React Native Elements offers a wide variety of basic UI components, it may lack some advanced components that require developers to implement their own solutions or integrate additional libraries.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction layer added by using React Native Elements may introduce some performance overhead compared to building components from scratch, especially for more complex or resource-intensive applications.
  • Third-party Dependency
    Relying on a third-party library means developers may face issues related to external dependencies such as delays in updates or compatibility issues with newer versions of React Native.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    While the library is designed to be easy to use, fully customizing the components to meet specific UI/UX requirements may involve a learning curve, especially for developers new to the ecosystem.
  • Convention over Configuration
    Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
  • Built-in Tooling
    Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
  • Addon Ecosystem
    Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
  • Blueprints and Generators
    Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
  • Stable Long-term Support
    Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
  • Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
    Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
  • Build Performance
    For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
  • Rigid Structure
    The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
  • Migration Complexity
    Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

React Native Elements
E
Ember-cli

No analysis of React Native Elements yet.

Overall verdict

  • Ember CLI is a solid, mature command-line tool for building Ember.js applications, offering strong conventions, built-in tooling, and a stable development workflow that has been refined over many years.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a standardized project structure and conventions, reducing setup decisions and configuration overhead
  • Includes built-in support for ES modules, testing, and asset compilation out of the box
  • Strong addon ecosystem allows easy integration of third-party functionality
  • Backed by the official Ember.js team, ensuring long-term support and consistent updates
  • Automatic reloading and rebuilding during development speeds up the workflow
  • Encourages best practices like testing and modular code organization

Recommended for

  • Teams building large-scale, maintainable web applications with Ember.js
  • Developers who prefer convention-over-configuration frameworks
  • Projects that require long-term stability and structured upgrade paths
  • Organizations already invested in the Ember.js ecosystem
  • Developers who value built-in testing and tooling integration without extra setup

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
React Native Elements
E
Ember-cli
100% 100%
0% 0%
68% 68%
32% 32%
0% 0%
100% 100%
65% 65%
35% 35%

User comments

Share your experience with using React Native Elements and Ember-cli. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

React Native Elements 0 mentions
E
Ember-cli 1 mention

Tracking React Native Elements since Mar 2021.

  • Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!
    The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago

Alternatives to React Native Elements and Ember-cli

When comparing React Native Elements and Ember-cli, you can also consider the following products.