React Boilerplate VS Ember-cli

• Established Structure
  React Boilerplate provides a well-organized and consistent project structure, making it easier for developers to follow best practices and maintain a scalable codebase.
• Advanced Configuration
  The boilerplate offers a comprehensive setup with support for modern JavaScript features, including Webpack, Babel, and ESLint, reducing the need for manual configuration.
• Redux Integration
  React Boilerplate comes with built-in support for Redux, helping manage application state efficiently and seamlessly.
• Performance Optimization
  The boilerplate includes performance-focused tools and configurations such as code splitting, which helps in optimizing the application's performance.
• Community and Documentation
  Being a popular project, React Boilerplate has extensive documentation and an active community, providing plenty of resources and support.
• Testing Setup
  It includes testing frameworks like Jest and Enzyme, which facilitate writing and running tests for your React components and applications.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Initial Setup
  The extensive initial setup and configuration process might be daunting for beginners or developers unfamiliar with advanced React and Webpack configurations.
• Overhead for Small Projects
  For small or simple projects, the boilerplate might feel like overkill, introducing unnecessary complexity and overhead.
• Steep Learning Curve
  Due to its comprehensive nature and numerous built-in features, there can be a steep learning curve for developers who are new to the ecosystem.
• Maintenance
  Keeping up with updates and changes in all included libraries and tools can be time-consuming and may require regular maintenance to ensure compatibility and security.
• Customization Difficulties
  Altering the default configurations and structures to fit unique needs can sometimes be challenging and may require in-depth knowledge of the underlying tools.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

React Boilerplate com Redux e TypeScript

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Redux developers, please stop doing this!

  I worked on a React project in 2019, I believe it was built on top of the react-boilerplate template, and the developer experience with Redux was so bad that I became a Vue developer. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Top 5 React Boilerplates to Know in 2023

  2 React Boilerplate is a reliable and well-designed boilerplate in the Javascript UI Libraries, with 28.2k ratings on GitHub. The super-rich component and font base, together with Redux, Mocha, Redux-Saga, Jest, React Router, PostCSS,... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

• Redux Sagas firing multiple times if injected in different containers

  We are using https://github.com/react-boilerplate/react-boilerplate and have a classic store layout with multiple components. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago