
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Ray.so seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 35 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | ray.so | bitgapp.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No Ray.so videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Controlling External Monitor Volume: How to Use eqMac with HDMI, USB-C, and DisplayPort Connections
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Ray.so and eqMac. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


A plain textarea. Editing is a layered over the highlighted lines. It keeps your text exactly as you typed it, and it's deliberately not an IDE.- The stack. Svelte 5, TypeScript, Shiki for highlighting,...
- Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
I share code snippets on LinkedIn and Twitter fairly often. Plain screenshots get scrolled past. Ray.so takes the same code and wraps it in a clean dark card with syntax highlighting. The difference in engagement is measurable. Same... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Then I tried the free classics - Ray.so and Carbon.now.sh. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Tracking eqMac since Nov 2022.
When comparing Ray.so and eqMac, you can also consider the following products.


The sound control that should be built into MacOS
Compare SoundSource to Ray.so or eqMac:


Your currently playing track displayed right on your desktop
Compare Sleeve to Ray.so or eqMac:

snappify is a great tool to create and adjust beautiful code snippets easily.
Compare Snappify to Ray.so or eqMac:

Bring iOS-style elegance to your Mac’s volume control.
Compare Volume Glass to Ray.so or eqMac: