Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

RawGit VS Does.qa

Compare RawGit VS Does.qa and see what are their differences

Umso
The Website Builder for Startups sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

RawGit logo RawGit

RawGit serves raw files directly from GitHub with proper content-type headers.

Does.qa logo Does.qa

DoesQA is a no-code solution which unlocks the power of automation testing for everyone in every project.
  • RawGit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-23
  • Does.qa
    Image date //
    2024-07-09

DoesQA is Codeless test automation that's more powerful than code! Any team member can create complex automation tests easily, enabling QA to keep pace with development and build coverage while reducing costs.

DoesQA doesn't just make the easy stuff easier; our codeless test automation tool also supports API integrations, Visual Regression, Pa11y, Lighthouse, and many more.

You'll be able to create tests in minutes which would have taken months in code.

RawGit

Website
rawgit.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Does.qa

Website
does.qa
Pricing URL
Official Does.qa Pricing
$ Details
paid Free Trial $95 / Monthly (Unlimited Testing, Unlimited Users, 10 Parallel Runners)
Platforms
Google Chrome Firefox Edge
Release Date
2023 March
Edit details

RawGit features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    RawGit provides an easy way to serve files directly from a GitHub repository with simple URL access, requiring minimal setup.
  • Convenient for Demos
    It allows developers to quickly demo a webpage or tool hosted in a GitHub repository without deploying it to a dedicated server.
  • CORS Support
    RawGit has Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) headers enabled, which makes it easier to include resources hosted on GitHub into web projects.

Possible disadvantages of RawGit

  • Not Suitable for Production
    RawGit explicitly states that it is not intended for production use due to lack of scalability and potential reliability issues.
  • Limited Bandwidth
    The service is limited by bandwidth and usage restrictions, which may result in files being inaccessible if usage exceeds certain limits.
  • Deprecation Warning
    As of the last updates, RawGit announced it was shutting down and encouraged users to switch to alternative solutions for hosting files.

Does.qa features and specs

  • Unlimited Concurrency
  • Multi-browser
  • Drag-and-drop UI
  • Lighthouse
  • Visual Regression
  • Pa11y
  • API
  • Slack Integration
  • CI/CD
  • Scheduling
  • Email Testing
  • Generate Authentic MFA Tokens

RawGit videos

+ Add

Host a CSS or JS file on Gist and redirect through RawGit CDN

Does.qa videos

+ Add

Introduction to DoesQA

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RawGit and Does.qa)

RawGit

Does.qa

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100
CDN
100 100%
CDN
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
Testing
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing RawGit and Does.qa.

What makes your product unique?

Does.qa's answer:

DoesQA simplifies test creation and improves reliability while keeping the tester in control. With unlimited concurrency as standard there's no faster way to create or run your tests.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Does.qa's answer:

DoesQA is the only solution which supports branching tests, API requests and Lighthouse Audits. DoesQA was built by experienced SDETs to make testing simpler, faster and more cost-effective while allowing all the power which comes with a traditional code-based solution.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Does.qa's answer:

Engineering teams who want powerful web end-to-end automation tests without the costs typically associated with building a test framework and running tests remotely.

What's the story behind your product?

Does.qa's answer:

Everyone's endlessly wasting money building their own test framework.

User comments

Share your experience with using RawGit and Does.qa. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Does.qa seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RawGit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RawGit yet. Tracking of RawGit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Does.qa mentions (1)

  • Automation Tool that can handle BOTH Web and Mobile App testing
    Hey, DoesQA here, we have a compatible set of steps as WebdriverIO but as a codeless test automation tool. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RawGit and Does.qa, you can also consider the following products

Statically - The free optimization & CDN for images, CSS, JavaScript, and open source.

DogQ.io - No-code tests in cloud for web developers with all skill levels

jsDelivr - A free, fast, and reliable Open Source CDN for npm and GitHub with the largest network and best performance from all OSS CDNs. Serving 100 billion requests per month.

Testpine - No Code Test Automation for Web & Mobile and Test Management

raw.githack.com - raw.githack.com serves raw files from github.com with proper Content-Type headers (like rawgit.

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) - World’s first full-stack Agentic AI Quality Engineering platform.

Loading...