Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RawGit VS cdnjs

Compare RawGit VS cdnjs and see what are their differences

RawGit logo RawGit

RawGit serves raw files directly from GitHub with proper content-type headers.

cdnjs logo cdnjs

An open source community driven JS/CSS CDN.
  • RawGit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-23
  • cdnjs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-17

RawGit features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    RawGit provides an easy way to serve files directly from a GitHub repository with simple URL access, requiring minimal setup.
  • Convenient for Demos
    It allows developers to quickly demo a webpage or tool hosted in a GitHub repository without deploying it to a dedicated server.
  • CORS Support
    RawGit has Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) headers enabled, which makes it easier to include resources hosted on GitHub into web projects.

Possible disadvantages of RawGit

  • Not Suitable for Production
    RawGit explicitly states that it is not intended for production use due to lack of scalability and potential reliability issues.
  • Limited Bandwidth
    The service is limited by bandwidth and usage restrictions, which may result in files being inaccessible if usage exceeds certain limits.
  • Deprecation Warning
    As of the last updates, RawGit announced it was shutting down and encouraged users to switch to alternative solutions for hosting files.

cdnjs features and specs

  • Wide range of libraries
    cdnjs offers a vast collection of JavaScript libraries, allowing developers to access and integrate them easily into their projects.
  • Enhanced Performance
    By using a CDN like cdnjs, resources are delivered from servers closest to the user, reducing loading times and improving website performance.
  • Reliability
    cdnjs is supported by well-established infrastructure, ensuring uptime and reliability when serving files.
  • Easy Versioning
    Developers can easily specify which version of a library they wish to use, providing control and flexibility in management.
  • Cost-effective
    Being a free service, cdnjs allows developers to leverage CDN capabilities without incurring costs.

Possible disadvantages of cdnjs

  • Dependency on Third-party
    Relying on an external CDN means that developers are dependent on their uptime and service quality.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Using a CDN can lead to potential data privacy issues, as user requests are routed through third-party servers.
  • Version Mismatch
    If not carefully managed, there can be inconsistencies in library versions across different environments, leading to potential conflicts.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Since cdnjs relies on internet connectivity, access to these libraries is compromised if there is no or poor internet connection.

Analysis of cdnjs

Overall verdict

  • Yes, cdnjs is generally considered a good service for hosting front-end libraries.

Why this product is good

  • cdnjs is a widely-used content delivery network that provides developers with access to a large repository of open-source JavaScript and CSS libraries. It's known for its reliability, speed, and ease of use. The platform is backed by Cloudflare, ensuring fast delivery and minimized latency. Additionally, cdnjs offers a vast selection of libraries, regular updates, and easy integration into web projects.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for a reliable CDN to host JavaScript and CSS libraries.
  • Projects requiring quick and easy access to popular front-end libraries.
  • Web applications that need to ensure optimal performance and fast loading times.
  • Teams seeking a hassle-free way to manage and include third-party libraries in their codebase.

RawGit videos

Host a CSS or JS file on Gist and redirect through RawGit CDN

cdnjs videos

Making Your Web Site Faster With CDNJS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RawGit and cdnjs)
Cloud Computing
19 19%
81% 81
CDN
17 17%
83% 83
Image Optimisation
36 36%
64% 64
Content Delivery Network
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RawGit and cdnjs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, cdnjs seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RawGit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RawGit yet. Tracking of RawGit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

cdnjs mentions (17)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RawGit and cdnjs, you can also consider the following products

Statically - The free optimization & CDN for images, CSS, JavaScript, and open source.

CloudFlare - Cloudflare is a global network designed to make everything you connect to the Internet secure, private, fast, and reliable.

raw.githack.com - raw.githack.com serves raw files from github.com with proper Content-Type headers (like rawgit.

Amazon CloudFront - Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery web service.

jsDelivr - A free, fast, and reliable Open Source CDN for npm and GitHub with the largest network and best performance from all OSS CDNs. Serving 100 billion requests per month.

KeyCDN - KeyCDN is a high-performance Content Delivery Network (CDN). Lowest price globally at $0.04/GB with HTTP/2 Support and free Origin Shield.