Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
RHT

RasterizeHTML.js VS jsdom

Compare RasterizeHTML.js VS jsdom and see what are their differences

Kollabe
Elevate your Agile Meetings with Engaging Tools for Teams. Our Planning Poker and Retrospectives Tools are designed for seamless, fun collaboration. Perfect for all Teams. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

RasterizeHTML.js logo RasterizeHTML.js

Renders HTML into the browser's canvas.

jsdom logo jsdom

A JavaScript implementation of various web standards, for use with Node.js - jsdom/jsdom
  • RasterizeHTML.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-07
  • jsdom Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

RasterizeHTML.js features and specs

  • Cross-browser Compatibility
    RasterizeHTML.js is designed to work across different browsers, ensuring consistent output regardless of the user's environment.
  • HTML and CSS Support
    The library can handle and render HTML and CSS accurately, which is crucial for generating pixel-perfect images from web content.
  • SVG Rendering
    It supports rendering content into SVG images, which can be useful for generating scalable graphics.
  • No Server Requirement
    RasterizeHTML.js operates entirely on the client side, eliminating the need for server-side processing and simplifying deployment.
  • Customization Options
    The library provides various configuration options for customizing the rendering process, such as specifying viewports and handling external resources.

Possible disadvantages of RasterizeHTML.js

  • Performance Limitations
    Rendering complex or very large HTML content can be performance-intensive and may result in slow processing times or high memory usage.
  • Limited JavaScript Execution
    RasterizeHTML.js does not fully support executing JavaScript within the rendered content, which can limit its ability to handle dynamic or interactive elements.
  • Security Risks
    Processing arbitrary HTML and CSS on the client side could expose security vulnerabilities if not handled carefully, especially with untrusted content.
  • Lack of Maintenance
    As of the latest update, the library has limited recent updates, which may affect compatibility with newer web standards or features.
  • Resource Handling
    External resources such as images and fonts may require additional handling or configuration to ensure they're properly rendered in the final output.

jsdom features and specs

  • Browser-like Environment
    jsdom provides a virtual representation of the browser's DOM environment, which allows developers to run scripts that usually require a browser.
  • Node.js Integration
    Being a Node.js library, jsdom can be easily integrated into server-side applications, enabling server-side DOM manipulation.
  • Testing Facilitation
    jsdom is commonly used in testing frameworks to simulate browser environments, allowing for headless testing of front-end code.
  • Standard-compliant
    jsdom strives to be compliant with web standards, which ensures consistent behavior with real browser environments.
  • Rich API
    It provides a rich set of APIs that mimic the browser DOM, making it comprehensive for developers needing browser-like functionality.

Possible disadvantages of jsdom

  • Performance Overhead
    jsdom can be slower than real browser environments because it runs in Node.js and not in a optimized browser engine.
  • Limited Browser Features
    While jsdom supports many DOM features, it might not support all the modern APIs and features available in the latest browsers.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple jsdom instances can be resource-intensive, which may not be ideal for applications with large-scale DOM manipulation.
  • JavaScript Only
    Being specific to JavaScript and Node.js, jsdom is not suitable for developers working primarily in other programming environments.
  • Complexity in Setup
    Setting up and configuring jsdom for specific use cases can be more complex compared to some alternatives, requiring more effort from the developer.

RasterizeHTML.js videos

No RasterizeHTML.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

jsdom videos

+ Add

JSDom & Enzyme: Different Test Styles for React Apps - Dan La Feir @ ReactNYC

More videos:

  • Review - Frontend Pairing - Discovering missing JSDOM APIs that didn’t allow to test Toast UI in jest

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RasterizeHTML.js and jsdom)

RasterizeHTML.js

jsdom

Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100
Development
28 28%
Development
72% 72
Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using RasterizeHTML.js and jsdom. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, jsdom seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RasterizeHTML.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RasterizeHTML.js yet. Tracking of RasterizeHTML.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

jsdom mentions (32)

  • Proton: Pluggable SSR + DOM | Or How I implemented better SSR from scratch
    Nah, I took a third path - looking for alternatives to JSDOM... And I found it - happy-dom. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • The Future of Htmx
    We do have pseudo-browsers written in pure js that you can theoretically use: https://github.com/jsdom/jsdom but they're about as reliable as you can expect: it's difficult to keep up the pace with the big three (or two) on standards compliance, and they usually don't even try. So the only reliable solution is a headless Chromium, Firefox, and/or WebKit-based noname browser like the sibling says.... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Go-DOM - A headless browser written in Go.
    Internally the test starts an HTTP server. Because the this runs in the test process, mocking and stubbing of business logic is possible. The test use jsdom to communicate with the HTTP server; which both parse the HTML response into a DOM, but also executes client-side script in a sandbox which has been initialised, e.g. With window as the global scope.3. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Excluding Dependencies: Bundling for Node and the Browser
    For example, I needed to parse an HTML string into a DOM Document. The browser already supports the DOMParser class, which is, unfortunately, not available in Node.js. Here, I have to fall back on JSDOM, which also exposes this class. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Migrating from Jest to Vitest for your React Application
    If you happen to be using React Testing Library in your project, you'll need to keep the jsdom dev dependency installed. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RasterizeHTML.js and jsdom, you can also consider the following products

GeoScreenshot - Test your website from anywhere in the world. Check availability, website consistency, geo-specific targeting, localization, location-based redirects, performance.

react-testing-library - [`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding

Desktop Icon Toy - Desktop Icon Toy is an elegant software designed for the desktop helping out users to change and restore the layouts when they get changed due to certain reasons.

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

html2canvas - JavaScript library to take "screenshots" of webpages or parts of it, directly on the...

BackstopJS - BackstopJS is an open-source tool that allows the user to capture screenshots of a complete webpage or only specific areas of the webpage.

Loading...