Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

RapidAPI for Mac VS CodeKeep

Compare RapidAPI for Mac VS CodeKeep and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

RapidAPI for Mac logo RapidAPI for Mac

Paw is a REST client for Mac.

CodeKeep logo CodeKeep

Codekeep lets you store and share bits of code and text with other users. Snippets can be organized into folders/labels for instant reuse.
  • RapidAPI for Mac Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-10-20
  • CodeKeep Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-09-19

RapidAPI for Mac features and specs

  • User Interface
    Paw.cloud offers an intuitive and visually appealing user interface, making it easy to design and manage APIs.
  • Team Collaboration
    Paw.cloud supports team collaboration features, allowing multiple users to work on API projects simultaneously.
  • Advanced Request Capabilities
    The platform offers advanced request capabilities, including the ability to customize headers, parameters, and bodies with ease.
  • Extensions and Plugins
    Paw.cloud supports a variety of extensions and plugins, allowing users to extend its functionalities according to their needs.
  • Multi-Environment Support
    The tool provides support for multiple environments, enabling seamless switching between development, staging, and production setups.

Possible disadvantages of RapidAPI for Mac

  • Cost
    Paw.cloud is a paid service, which may not be suitable for individuals or small teams with limited budgets.
  • Platform Limitation
    The software is currently available only for macOS, which limits its accessibility to a wider range of users who might be using other operating systems.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, there is still a learning curve for new users to fully utilize all of its advanced features.
  • Resource Intensive
    Paw.cloud can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down performance on older hardware.
  • Offline Accessibility
    Some functionalities may be limited or unavailable in offline mode, which could hinder productivity in environments with unstable internet connections.

CodeKeep features and specs

  • Collaboration Tools
  • Code Editor
  • Code snippets

RapidAPI for Mac videos

+ Add

Dr Paw Paw Review & Demo | Abbey Clayton

More videos:

  • Review - Paw Perfect Review - Testing As Seen On TV Products
  • Review - PAW PATROL: ON A ROLL - REVIEW

CodeKeep videos

No CodeKeep videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RapidAPI for Mac and CodeKeep)

RapidAPI for Mac

CodeKeep

API Tools
100 100%
API Tools
0% 0
Developer Tools
78 78%
Developer Tools
22% 22
APIs
100 100%
APIs
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RapidAPI for Mac and CodeKeep. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare RapidAPI for Mac and CodeKeep

RapidAPI for Mac Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Are you a developer that works with macOS? Then Paw is the right pick for you. Paw is specifically built for macOS. As such, it is arguably the best tool for Mac interface. Unlike Postman which majorly revolves around API, Paw is an all-in-one tool for API development, HTTP Client, API description, and more. In terms of its functionalities, it can send all kinds of HTTP...
Source: www.bestproxyreviews.com
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
Paw is a full-featured HTTP client, which allows you to send all kinds of HTTP requests. With Paw, you can test your APIs and also explore new ones.
Source: geekflare.com
15 Best Postman Alternatives for Automated API Testing [2022 Updated]
Paw is an advanced API tool with powerful features designed explicitly for Mac. Its primary function is to test and describe APIs, and it provides a beautiful interface to make activities such as composing requests, inspecting server responses, and exporting API definitions easier.
Source: testsigma.com

CodeKeep Reviews

We have no reviews of CodeKeep yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RapidAPI for Mac seems to be a lot more popular than CodeKeep. While we know about 45 links to RapidAPI for Mac, we've tracked only 4 mentions of CodeKeep. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RapidAPI for Mac mentions (45)

  • Learning API Requests with GUI client - The easy way🚀🚀
    Although Apidog is a popular REST client, you can also use others, such as Insomnia, RapidAPI for Mac, and Hoppscotch. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Sending both File and JSON in One Request to Spring Boot
    But it can't help when faced with this complex scenario because it doesn't support set the content-type for text field of a multipart request. I tried Paw, Bruno and they didn't work either. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • The Best Alternatives to Postman for API Testing
    To use Paw, purchase and download it from the Paw website. Open the app, create a new request, and start testing your API endpoints with ease. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Ask HN: Alternatives to Postman?
    Enjoy it while it lasts: https://paw.cloud/. Really good. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Bruno
    I myself use Paw [0] because it's native to MacOS, but I'm a little bit worried for it's longevity as it being supported by a SaaS business. But so far it's been great to document API for my personal projects. [0]: https://paw.cloud/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

CodeKeep mentions (4)

  • Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (September 2024)
    Hi there, I'm Jithin, a full-stack developer with ~9 years of experience looking for exciting new opportunities (remote or relocation friendly). I'm passionate about building robust, scalable cloud-native solutions with a focus on Golang microservices, GraphQL APIs, Next.js frontend. My experience extends to a diverse range of technologies which can be viewed on https://jithin.im I am also the founder of... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • 🚀 📸 Creating Accessible and Stunning code screenshots
    Create an account on https://codekeep.io. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Show HN: I'm working on an open-source self-hostable GitHub Gist
    I have also created a similar product, its called codekeep http://codekeep.io , - google keep for codesnippets that allows users to tag and organize snippets. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    CodeKeep - Google Keep for Code Snippets. Organize,Discover and share code snippets, featuring a powerful code screenshot tool with preset templates and linking feature. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RapidAPI for Mac and CodeKeep, you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

thiscodeWorks - Save and share code that works

Insomnia REST - Design, debug, test, and mock APIs locally, on Git, or cloud. Build better APIs collaboratively for the most popular protocols with a dev‑friendly UI, built-in automation, and an extensible plugin ecosystem.

CodeMyUI - Handpicked code snippets you can use in your web projects

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

30 seconds of code - JS snippets that you can understand in 30 seconds or less.

Loading...