Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Random User-Agent VS UASwitcher

Compare Random User-Agent VS UASwitcher and see what are their differences

Random User-Agent logo Random User-Agent

Automatically change the user agent after specified period of time to a randomly selected one, thus...

UASwitcher logo UASwitcher

Download User-Agent Switcher for Firefox. Easily override the browser's User-Agent string
  • Random User-Agent Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • UASwitcher Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-24

Random User-Agent features and specs

  • Privacy Enhancement
    Random User-Agent helps in enhancing user privacy by rotating user-agent strings, making it harder for trackers to build a consistent profile of the user.
  • Bypass Basic Scraping Restrictions
    By changing user-agent strings frequently, Random User-Agent can help bypass basic scraping restrictions implemented by some websites.
  • Improved Testing
    It allows developers to test how their websites behave across different browsers and devices by simulating various user-agent strings.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, it provides transparency and the opportunity for users to inspect and contribute to the codebase.
  • Flexibility
    Users can customize the list of user-agent strings to include ones that suit their specific needs or target different scenarios.

Possible disadvantages of Random User-Agent

  • Website Compatibility Issues
    Some websites may not function correctly if they are presented with outdated or unsupported user-agent strings.
  • Potential for Abuse
    The tool could be used for unethical purposes, such as circumventing access restrictions or malicious web scraping, leading to potential abuse.
  • Increased Detection Risk
    Some advanced anti-bot systems may detect the frequent change in user-agent strings as suspicious behavior, potentially blocking access.
  • Reduced Performance
    For applications heavily relying on a consistent user-agent for caching or optimization, changing these strings randomly could lead to reduced performance.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Maintaining an up-to-date list of user-agent strings requires ongoing effort to ensure compatibility with the latest browser versions.

UASwitcher features and specs

  • User Agent Masking
    UASwitcher allows users to change their browser's user-agent string, which helps in masking their actual browser and operating system details, enhancing privacy and testing how different websites respond to various devices.
  • Web Development Testing
    Web developers can benefit from UASwitcher by testing how their websites appear and perform across different browsers and devices without needing the actual devices.
  • Bypass Restrictions
    UASwitcher can help users bypass certain IP restrictions on websites that limit content based on specific user-agent strings, enabling access to more information or services.

Possible disadvantages of UASwitcher

  • Compatibility Issues
    Changing the user-agent string can sometimes lead to compatibility issues with websites that require specific browser versions, potentially resulting in a suboptimal browsing experience.
  • Misleading Website Analytics
    By altering the user-agent string, users may inadvertently skew website analytics, making it difficult for webmasters to gather accurate data about their site's user demographics.
  • Potential Security Risks
    Switching user-agent strings may make browsers susceptible to security risks if the site expects security features present in modern browsers and instead receives requests mimicking outdated or unsupported versions.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Random User-Agent and UASwitcher)
Browser Extensions
70 70%
30% 30
Monitoring Tools
70 70%
30% 30
Dark Mode
70 70%
30% 30
Developer Tools
66 66%
34% 34

User comments

Share your experience with using Random User-Agent and UASwitcher. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Random User-Agent seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Random User-Agent mentions (2)

  • make a website believe youโ€˜re using windows
    Use the following extension and set a Windows user agent: https://github.com/tarampampam/random-user-agent. Source: over 2 years ago
  • The metaverse is bullshit
    It still doesn't make you safe from being tracked, it only makes you harder to track through fingerprinting and there are other methods to track you as well. A similar extension is also available for other browsers. Source: almost 4 years ago

UASwitcher mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of UASwitcher yet. Tracking of UASwitcher recommendations started around May 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Random User-Agent and UASwitcher, you can also consider the following products

User-Agent Switcher and Manager - spoofs browser's User-Agent string.

30 Seconds of Knowledge - Become a better developer, in every new tab.

Image Saver - Save any images in page directly from context menu, this includes svg elements, css background images and direct child images.

Chameleon WebExtension - Chameleon is a Firefox extension to Spoof your browser profile.

Vytal - Check if your location is actually hidden.

Tampermonkey - Greasemonkey compatible script manager.