Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

QUnit VS BrowserStack

Compare QUnit VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

Promptaa
Prompt organization and AI enhancement. Engineer prompts with 1 click. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

QUnit logo QUnit

What is QUnit? QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • QUnit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-17
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

QUnit

Website
jquery.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

BrowserStack

Website
browserstack.com
Pricing URL
Official BrowserStack Pricing
$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999
Edit details

QUnit features and specs

  • Simplicity
    QUnit is easy to set up and use, making it accessible for developers who are new to testing.
  • Integration with jQuery
    QUnit is designed to work seamlessly with jQuery, which is beneficial for projects that already use jQuery.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    Tests can run in various environments, including modern browsers and Node.js, providing flexibility for different use cases.
  • Rich in Features
    QUnit provides a comprehensive API for creating unit tests, assertions, and asynchronous testing, making it powerful for more advanced testing needs.
  • Community Support
    Being an established tool, QUnit has an active community and extensive documentation, which is helpful for troubleshooting and learning.

Possible disadvantages of QUnit

  • Limited Scope
    Primarily focused on unit testing, QUnit may lack support for more extensive testing scenarios like integration or end-to-end testing.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic usage is simple, mastering advanced features and customizations might require a deeper understanding of the library.
  • Less Modern than Some Alternatives
    Compared to newer frameworks that offer more features out-of-the-box, QUnit might seem less modern or lacking in some advanced testing capabilities.
  • Tightly Coupled with jQuery
    For teams not using jQuery, the close integration of QUnit with jQuery might be unnecessary and lead to additional overhead.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

Analysis of BrowserStack

Overall verdict

  • Overall, BrowserStack is considered a highly effective and reliable tool in the web development and testing community. Its extensive features, real-device testing capabilities, and seamless integration make it a good choice for those needing comprehensive cross-browser testing solutions.

Why this product is good

  • BrowserStack is a robust and widely used web testing platform that provides developers with the ability to test their websites and applications across a vast array of browsers and devices. It offers real device cloud testing, ensuring that users can assess how their applications perform on actual devices rather than simulations. This makes it an invaluable tool for identifying and resolving cross-browser compatibility issues. Additionally, it integrates with popular CI/CD tools, enhancing the workflow efficiency for development teams.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • QA engineers
  • Agile development teams
  • Companies needing cross-browser testing across multiple devices
  • Teams looking for CI/CD integration in their testing process

QUnit videos

No QUnit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

BrowserStack videos

+ Add

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QUnit and BrowserStack)

QUnit

BrowserStack

Testing
100 100%
Testing
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100
Automated Testing
10 10%
Automated Testing
90% 90
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using QUnit and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare QUnit and BrowserStack

QUnit Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
QUnit is a unit testing tool (rather framework) that can test any generic JavaScript code. Most jQuery projects use QUnit. QUnit has become essential as JS is now integral to any web project, and manual testing of so many functionalities is complicated and unreliable. Further, QUnit is powerful and easy to use. Unit tests written for one application can be reused for other...
Source: hackr.io

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

QUnit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QUnit yet. Tracking of QUnit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

BrowserStack mentions (8)

  • Show HN: Quell – AI QA Agent Working Across Linear, Vercel, Jira, Netlify, Figma
    This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / 20 days ago
  • 🛑 Stop resizing your browser: improve testing for responsiveness
    Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Unsupported country
    If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Windows vs Mac?
    For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?
    I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QUnit and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

Jasmine - Behavior-Driven JavaScript

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Mocha - Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

EyeJS - A JavaScript testing framework for the real world.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Loading...