Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Quill VS TOAST UI Editor

Compare Quill VS TOAST UI Editor and see what are their differences

Quill logo Quill

Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

TOAST UI Editor logo TOAST UI Editor

Markdown WYSIWYG editor
  • Quill Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-20
  • TOAST UI Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-17

Quill features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    Quill offers a highly intuitive interface thatโ€™s easy for users to navigate, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users.
  • Rich Text Editing
    Quill supports rich text editing, allowing formatting, embedding media, and even custom operations through an extensive API.
  • Customizability
    Developers can customize the editor through themes, modules, and configurations, enabling a wide range of tailored implementations.
  • Open Source
    Quill is open source, allowing developers to contribute to its development, inspect the code, and ensure it aligns with their security standards.
  • Modular Architecture
    Its modular architecture lets developers include only the features they need, optimizing performance and user experience.
  • Active Community and Support
    Quill has an active community, providing extensive documentation, examples, and community support which makes it easier to troubleshoot issues and integrate the editor.

Possible disadvantages of Quill

  • Complex Customization
    While Quill is customizable, achieving advanced or very specific customizations can sometimes be complex and time-consuming, requiring in-depth knowledge of its API.
  • Performance Issues
    In some cases, especially with large documents or a high number of embedded elements, users may experience performance lags or slower response times.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Out of the box, Quill provides a limited set of features compared to some other rich text editors. Additional features often require custom modules or extensions.
  • Lack of Some Advanced Features
    Certain advanced editing features like track changes and version history are not natively supported and need to be implemented separately.
  • Browser Compatibility
    Although Quill supports modern browsers, there may be some inconsistencies or issues in rendering across different browsers and devices, necessitating additional testing and adjustments.
  • Learning Curve for Developers
    New developers may face a steep learning curve when trying to understand and utilize Quillโ€™s API and functionality fully.

TOAST UI Editor features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    TOAST UI Editor provides a clean and intuitive interface that is easy to use for both developers and end-users. This enhances user experience by making editing tasks straightforward.
  • Markdown Support
    The editor offers comprehensive support for Markdown, allowing users to write and edit text using Markdown syntax, which is popular for its simplicity and readability.
  • Customizability
    TOAST UI Editor is highly customizable, offering various options to modify the toolbar, themes, and plugins to suit different project needs and personal preferences.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    The editor supports an extensive range of plugins, enhancing its functionality with features like chart rendering, UML diagrams, and code syntax highlighting.
  • Collaborative Editing
    It provides capabilities for real-time collaborative editing, making it suitable for team environments where multiple users may need to work on the same document simultaneously.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    TOAST UI Editor works reliably across different browsers, ensuring consistency and stability for users on diverse platforms.

Possible disadvantages of TOAST UI Editor

  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic features are straightforward, utilizing some of the advanced customizations and integrations may require a deeper understanding of the editor's architecture and API.
  • Performance with Large Documents
    Users may experience performance issues when working with very large documents or datasets, as rendering and processing might become slower.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies for various plugins and extensions can be complex and may require additional effort, especially in large-scale projects.
  • Limited Documentation
    Some users report that the documentation, while helpful, may lack comprehensive examples for troubleshooting and advanced use cases, making self-guidance challenging.

Analysis of Quill

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Quill is a highly recommended rich text editor for web applications due to its flexibility, ease of use, and active development community.

Why this product is good

  • Quill is considered a good choice for a rich text editor because it is lightweight, highly customizable, and easy to integrate. It provides a modern and clean user interface, supports a wide range of features such as themes and modules, and offers excellent performance. Quill's community and comprehensive documentation also make it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for a lightweight and customizable rich text editor.
  • Projects requiring a straightforward integration process.
  • Applications needing extendable functionality through modules and themes.
  • Environments that prioritize performance and a modern UI.

Quill videos

Fransesco Rubinato Quill Pen Review

More videos:

  • Review - Harry Potter Quill Vs Writing Quill Review
  • Review - STORYBOOK COSMETICS QUILL & INK LINER REVIEW/DEMO/ALL DAY WEAR TEST | storiesinthedust

TOAST UI Editor videos

Discussing the future of Toast UI Editor in the Static Site Editor

More videos:

  • Review - TOAST UI Editor
  • Review - แ„†แ…ฉแ„ƒแ…ฅแ†ซแ„‹แ…ฐแ†ธ(NEMV) แ„Œแ…ฆแ„Œแ…กแ†จ 87 แ„‹แ…ฑแ„Œแ…ตแ„‹แ…ฏแ†จ แ„‹แ…ฆแ„ƒแ…ตแ„แ…ฅ แ„‰แ…กแ„‹แ…ญแ†ผแ„’แ…กแ„€แ…ต(toast ui editor)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Quill and TOAST UI Editor)
Text Editors
87 87%
13% 13
Rich Text Editor
82 82%
18% 18
IDEs And Text Editors
72 72%
28% 28
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Quill and TOAST UI Editor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Quill and TOAST UI Editor

Quill Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
If you are looking for a polished free, open-source WYSIWYG editor with no premium frills, Quill (or Quilljs) should be the perfect text editor. It is a lightweight editor with a minimal user interface that allows you to customize or add your extensions to scale their functionalities per your requirements.
Source: itsfoss.com
Looking for a CKEditor? Try these 10 Alternatives
Quill is a lightweight and modular WYSIWYG editor that supports a range of formatting options and features. Its minimalist design makes it a great choice for those who want a simple editor thatโ€™s easy to use.

TOAST UI Editor Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Toast UI editor will be a perfect fit if you deal with Markdown documents to publish web pages.
Source: itsfoss.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Quill seems to be a lot more popular than TOAST UI Editor. While we know about 36 links to Quill, we've tracked only 2 mentions of TOAST UI Editor. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Quill mentions (36)

  • Tool of the week: Free WYSIWYG Editor with QuillJS
    Iโ€™ve put together a simple but powerful online WYSIWYG editor powered by QuillJS. Itโ€™s designed for developers, bloggers, and content managers who want to quickly create and format HTML without writing raw code. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • Few things to know
    Few alternatives in the category of text editors, Tiptap, Editorjs, Lexical and Quill. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Let's Develop a Fullstack Blogging CMS from Scratch using React.js and Node.js
    Create a new article page - will use "Quill Editor" for example, it will give us the possibility to work (create, update) with each article;. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Ask HN: How to integrate a Blog system into my NextJS app
    > One thing I learned is that you should lean towards letting non-technical people choose their own tools like why we largely let developers choose their own tools. IMHO: I think a more sustainable variant of this (for your own sanity) might be to ask them which tool(s) they like and then take some time to understand WHY. But then instead of just letting them use those directly, you would either vet them first... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • SLATE Code editor with highlight
    SLATE is an excellent library for creating WYSIWYG editors in REACT, I find it superior to QUILL. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

TOAST UI Editor mentions (2)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Quill and TOAST UI Editor, you can also consider the following products

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.

CLEditor - CLEditor is an open source jQuery plugin which provides a lightweight, full featured, cross...

Froala Editor - Froala Editor is a WYSIWYG HTML editorย that enables rich text editing capabilities for the applications.

Summernote - Summernote is a JavaScript library that helps users create WYSIWYG editors online.

Editor.js - A block-styled editor with clean JSON output