
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, QuickJS should be more popular than MadMapper. It has been mentioned 46 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | bellard.org | madmapper.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of QuickJS yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
QuickJS - IO, axios, redaxios, fetch
MadMapper MiniMAD Demo & Review
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using QuickJS and MadMapper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of QuickJS yet. Be the first one to post
Buy MadMapper: Starts at 449€ one time (about $512.12), for committed visual artists, stage designers, and multimedia production companies that want full lifetime access to MadMapper.
MadMapper is a widely recognized software known for its user-friendly interface and powerful features. It offers real-time projection mapping capabilities that facilitate the overlaying of videos, images, and...
Projection mapping has become increasingly popular in recent years, transforming ordinary objects into captivating visual displays. MadMapper has long been a favored software tool for projection mapping enthusiasts,...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


You don't need V8 for running JS for scripting, you have quickjs[1] or mquickjs[2] for example. You might have problems importing npm packages, but as we can see from lua plugins you don't even need support for package managers.... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
- QuickJS: https://bellard.org/quickjs/ Legendary. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
For those who would like a true "from scratch" implementation of JavaScript, Fabrice Bellard's QuickJS [1] is clean, readable and approachable. It's a full implementation of modern JavaScript in a straightforward project, not nearly as... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
I recently faced a challenge when trying to connect Madmapper to a web application. Since Madmapper only accepts OSC (Open Sound Control) messages, integrating it directly with today's web and mobile technologies was tricky. To overcome... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
⇒ Resolume ⇒ NestMap ⇒ TouchDesigner ⇒ MadMapper ⇒ Any other software listed on the Spout website. Source: about 3 years ago
Let’s assume these are traditional DMX controlled fixtures - (ie, Colour Force 72). Use something like mad mapper to merge your two sources. While not easy - it is very straightforward. Source: over 3 years ago
When comparing QuickJS and MadMapper, you can also consider the following products.