Qualys SSL Server Test VS Digraph.dev

• Comprehensive Analysis
  The SSL Server Test provides a detailed analysis of the SSL/TLS configuration, including protocol support, key exchange, and cipher strength, helping users identify potential weaknesses.
• Free Tool
  Qualys offers this tool free of charge, making it accessible to anyone interested in evaluating their server's SSL/TLS security without incurring costs.
• User-Friendly Interface
  The tool features a straightforward and intuitive web interface, allowing users of varying technical expertise to perform a server test easily.
• Grading System
  It provides an easy-to-understand grading system (A+ to F), which helps users quickly assess the overall security of their SSL/TLS configuration.
• Regular Updates
  Qualys continuously updates the test to incorporate the latest security standards and vulnerabilities, ensuring the tool remains relevant in the ever-evolving SSL/TLS landscape.

Possible disadvantages

• Public Results
  Test results are publicly accessible, which might be a concern for those who prefer confidentiality regarding their server's security status.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  The tool is designed for on-demand testing and does not provide continuous monitoring or automated alerts for changes in SSL/TLS security status.
• Limited Scope
  While comprehensive in analyzing SSL/TLS configurations, the tool does not cover other aspects of web server security, such as application vulnerabilities or network configurations.
• Load Implications
  Running the test can occasionally place a load on the server being analyzed, which might affect server performance during the test period.

• Developer-focused positioning
  The .dev domain and branding suggest a tool built for developers and technical teams, so its workflows are likely to fit engineering needs better than a generic product. I could not browse the site, so this is inferred from its positioning rather than confirmed.
• Graph-based approach
  The name 'Digraph' (directed graph) suggests it models information as connected nodes and relationships. That kind of structure can make dependencies, ideas, or decisions easier to see than flat lists or documents. Confirm how the product actually uses this.
• Modern, minimal presentation
  Newer developer tools tend to have lean interfaces and a focused feature set, which can mean a short learning curve and less clutter. I could not verify this for Digraph, so check it with a trial.
• Potential for better organization and clarity
  If the tool works as the name suggests, visualizing relationships between items can improve shared understanding across a team. The benefit depends on how well the product is executed.
• Early-stage responsiveness
  Smaller or newer products often respond quickly to user feedback and let users influence the roadmap. This is a general tendency and has not been verified for Digraph.

• Unable to have valid chain of authority

  Check it at https://ssllabs.com/ssltest and it will tell you what’s wrong with the chain. Source: over 3 years ago

• PAN-OS thinks the cert for https[:]//supportfiles[.]firemon[.]com is untrusted. Why?

  Didn’t know that one. I generally use ssl server test at https://ssllabs.com/ssltest. Source: over 3 years ago

• Looking for help with VIRTUAL_HOST set up and 502 Bad Gateway (possible bad SSL?)

  As far as the SSL error, your browser does not consider the certificate to be valid. It looks like you’re trying to use Let’s Encrypt (based on your .well-known/acme-challenge location. You’ll also need to provide the intermediary... Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Digraph.dev since Oct 2026.