QA Tech VS Cucumber

Compare QA Tech VS Cucumber and see what are their differences

Anything.so

Anything blends AI and human support to detect, delegate, and complete your tasks before they even reach your to-do list. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

QA Tech

Improve your software quality with AI-driven QA testing. Find out how to ensure bug-free apps, with instant feedback and better productivity.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

QA.tech website //
2024-11-14
Add Custom Tests //
2024-11-14
AI Agent Scans and Learns //
2024-11-14
Edit Tests //
2024-11-14

QA.tech is an AI-powered tool for QA testing, empowering engineers to be more productive by autonomous testing of applications. No more waiting for feedback from your QA team or stakeholders. Get instant feedback on your work, with less bugs, improved quality and faster time-to-market.

Landing page //
2022-01-19

QA Tech

Website: qa.tech
Pricing URL: Official QA Tech Pricing
$ Details: freemium $99.0 / Monthly ($99 /month per team)
Startup details
Country: Sweden
Founder(s): Daniel Mauno Pettersson, Patrick Lef, Vilhelm von Ehrenheim

Edit details

Cucumber

Website: cukes.info
Pricing URL: -
$ Details: -

Edit details

QA Tech features and specs

Automatic Test Detection
The AI scans your web app, and generates tests based on user interactions and objectives.
Create Custom Tests
Start with a simple prompt, and the AI will generate custom tests. Giving you a real working E2E test in just a few seconds.
Bug Reports
Receive detailed bug reports with console logs, network requests, and more. Replay tests and export issues to tools like Linear, Jira, or Clickup.

Cucumber features and specs

Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) Framework
Cucumber supports BDD, allowing collaboration between developers, testers, and non-technical stakeholders to improve the quality of development through clear specifications.
Gherkin Syntax
Utilizes the Gherkin language to write test cases in plain English, making them more readable and understandable for non-technical team members.
Integrates with Other Tools
Easily integrates with other testing and development frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, and Selenium, enhancing its flexibility and utility.
Open Source
As an open-source tool, Cucumber allows for extensive customization and community support, reducing the cost of setting up a testing framework.
Supports Multiple Languages
Offers support for various programming languages including Java, Ruby, and JavaScript, making it versatile for different project needs.

Possible disadvantages of Cucumber

Steep Learning Curve
Requires a good understanding of both BDD practices and Cucumber’s structure, which might be challenging for beginners.
Performance Overheads
Execution of Cucumber tests can be slower compared to other testing frameworks, making it less ideal for very large projects requiring fast feedback loops.
Verbose Code
Writing tests in Gherkin can lead to more verbose code, which might require additional maintenance and can become cumbersome over time.
Dependency Management
Managing dependencies for integrating Cucumber with other testing frameworks can be complex, requiring careful coordination.
Not Ideal for Unit Testing
Cucumber is more suited for acceptance and integration testing rather than unit testing, potentially necessitating additional tools for a comprehensive testing strategy.

Analysis of Cucumber

Overall verdict

Yes, Cucumber (cukes.info) is generally considered a good tool for behavior-driven development (BDD).

Why this product is good

Cucumber is highly regarded because it allows teams to write tests in plain language that can be understood by all stakeholders, regardless of technical expertise. This enhances communication and collaboration between developers, testers, and business professionals. Furthermore, it supports various programming languages and integrates well with other tools, making it versatile and adaptable to different engineering environments.

Recommended for

Teams practicing behavior-driven development (BDD)
Projects that require clear communication between non-technical and technical team members
Development environments where automated testing is an integral part of the process
Organizations aiming to improve collaboration and understanding across departments

QA Tech videos

No QA Tech videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Cucumber videos

+ Add

Madam Kilay Skin Magical Review / Orange cucumber review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QA Tech and Cucumber)

QA Tech

Cucumber

Developer Tools

100 100%

Developer Tools

0% 0

Automated Testing

0 0%

Automated Testing

100% 100

100 100%

0% 0

Testing

32 32%

Testing

68% 68

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing QA Tech and Cucumber.

What makes your product unique?

QA Tech's answer

QA.tech leverages AI to blend the expertise of QA engineers with the efficiency of automated testing, streamlining time-to-market, reducing expenses, and enhancing user satisfaction. By simulating human testing at automated speeds, we offer a comprehensive repository of best practices and usage patterns. Our services encompass identifying release-blocking issues and recommending code fixes and improvements of identified issues.

What's the story behind your product?

QA Tech's answer

QA.tech emerged from the recognition that traditional QA testing, while essential, is often perceived as time-consuming and monotonous. Developers prefer focusing on product development rather than writing and maintaining tests. To address this challenge, QA.tech was founded with the mission of automating QA testing using AI technology, freeing up developers' time and reducing errors. Backed by a $1 million pre-seed funding round, QA.tech aims to revolutionize software testing by combining the efficiency of end-to-end tests with the precision of manual testing. The founding team, comprising entrepreneurs and engineers with vast experience in technology and entrepreneurship, is dedicated to making QA testing more efficient and accessible for businesses across the globe.

How would you describe your primary audience?

QA Tech's answer

The primary audience for QA.tech includes software developers, CTOs, QA engineers at companies which provide a website application and are looking to streamline their quality assurance processes. These professionals are seeking efficient and effective solutions to automate testing, reduce errors, and accelerate time-to-market for their software products. Additionally, QA.tech may also appeal to product managers and other stakeholders responsible for overseeing software development projects and ensuring product quality.

User comments

Share your experience with using QA Tech and Cucumber. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare QA Tech and Cucumber

QA Tech Reviews

We have no reviews of QA Tech yet.
Be the first one to post

Cucumber Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives

Cucumber itself is not a test automation tool but a framework that supports BDD. It is often used in conjunction with Selenium to provide a layer where test scenarios are written in a way that is understandable by all team members. Unlike Selenium, which focuses on automating browser actions, Cucumber focuses on defining behavior and can be used to drive Selenium tests.

Source: bugbug.io

5 Selenium Alternatives to Fill in Your Top Testing Gaps

Business testers are likely to prefer to use Cucumber over Selenium since script Cucumber lets you write test scenarios using a plain-English scripting language called Gherkin. Using Gherkin instead of code makes test script creation a much simpler process, since anyone can read, write, and understand the scripts regardless of testing experience.

Source: www.perfecto.io

Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2018 (Comprehensive List)

Cucumber is an open-source tool that is designed over the concept of BDD (Behavior-driven development). It is used to perform the automated acceptance testing by running the examples that best describe the behavior of the application. It gets you a single up-to-date living document that is having both specification and test documentation.

Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cucumber seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

QA Tech mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QA Tech yet. Tracking of QA Tech recommendations started around Feb 2024.

Cucumber mentions (1)

Does Django have BDD testing tools comparable to Rails' testing tools?
Ruby/Rails enjoy some really nice and powerful Behavior Driven Design/Development testing frameworks like Cucumber and RSpec. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QA Tech and Cucumber, you can also consider the following products

Webo.AI - Welcome to the world of Infinite AI testing

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

QA Wolf - QA Wolf gets web apps to 80% automated end-to-end test coverage in weeks, not years. With unlimited, parallel runs and our Zero Flake Guarantee.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Owlity.ai - The first and only AI QA solution to replace your QA department. Our autonomous testing software eliminates the need for human involvement.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Owlity.ai vs Cucumber

Robot framework vs QA Tech