Software Alternatives & Startups

python xlrd VS Materialize CSS

Compare python xlrd VS Materialize CSS and see what are their differences

python xlrd

Please use openpyxl where you can... Contribute to python-excel/xlrd development by creating an account on GitHub.

Rating
0 reviews
Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Materialize CSS seems to be a lot more popular than python xlrd. While we know about 28 links to Materialize CSS, we've tracked only 2 mentions of python xlrd.

social mentions
2 vs 28
Application Builder popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
12 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

python xlrd
Materialize CSS
Website github.com materializecss.com
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

python xlrd 3 features
Materialize CSS 5 features
  • Simplicity
    xlrd provides a straightforward and easy-to-use API for reading Excel files, making it accessible for beginners and quick implementations.
  • Widely Used
    xlrd has been a popular choice for handling Excel files in Python, which means there is a lot of available documentation and community support.
  • Efficient Reading
    It is optimized for reading data from Excel files without loading entire data into memory, which is beneficial for handling large files.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Write Support
    xlrd is designed solely for reading, and it does not support writing or modifying Excel files.
  • Limited to Older Excel Formats
    With version 2.0 and above, xlrd only supports the older .xls Excel file format and does not support .xlsx files.
  • Deprecated Features
    Due to changes in dependencies and updates to Excel formats, some features in xlrd have become deprecated or removed, which can limit its functionality.
  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

python xlrd
Materialize CSS

No analysis of python xlrd yet.

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

python xlrd 0 videos + Add
Materialize CSS 1 video + Add

No python xlrd videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
python xlrd
Materialize CSS
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
21% 21%
79% 79%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using python xlrd and Materialize CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

python xlrd no reviews yet
Materialize CSS no reviews yet

We have no reviews of python xlrd yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

python xlrd 2 mentions
Materialize CSS 28 mentions
  • I need to read multiple excel files, extract a column from each and compose a new file
    So to get this out of the way first, xlrd has less features than openpyxl and in addition only works with the old '.xls' format, not the newer '.xlsx' format. Even on the xlrd's Github repo it says: 'Please use openpyxl where you can... '. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Sending Bulk SMS using Africas Talking, Python and Excel
    There are few alternative libraries for reading and writing excel files: Pandas, Xlrd , openpyxl among others. In the end I settled for openpyxl as I had the most experience Using it and it had support for .xlsx files. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Mistakes Were Made
    Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to python xlrd and Materialize CSS

When comparing python xlrd and Materialize CSS, you can also consider the following products.