Software Alternatives & Startups

python xlrd VS Codeship

Compare python xlrd VS Codeship and see what are their differences

python xlrd

Please use openpyxl where you can... Contribute to python-excel/xlrd development by creating an account on GitHub.

Rating
0 reviews
Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, python xlrd seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Application Builder popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
12 vs 179

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

python xlrd
Codeship
Website github.com cloudbees.com
Pricing —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

python xlrd 3 features
Codeship 6 features
  • Simplicity
    xlrd provides a straightforward and easy-to-use API for reading Excel files, making it accessible for beginners and quick implementations.
  • Widely Used
    xlrd has been a popular choice for handling Excel files in Python, which means there is a lot of available documentation and community support.
  • Efficient Reading
    It is optimized for reading data from Excel files without loading entire data into memory, which is beneficial for handling large files.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Write Support
    xlrd is designed solely for reading, and it does not support writing or modifying Excel files.
  • Limited to Older Excel Formats
    With version 2.0 and above, xlrd only supports the older .xls Excel file format and does not support .xlsx files.
  • Deprecated Features
    Due to changes in dependencies and updates to Excel formats, some features in xlrd have become deprecated or removed, which can limit its functionality.
  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

python xlrd 0 videos + Add
Codeship 2 videos + Add

No python xlrd videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos

  • - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
python xlrd
Codeship
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using python xlrd and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

python xlrd no reviews yet
Codeship no reviews yet

We have no reviews of python xlrd yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

python xlrd 2 mentions
Codeship 0 mentions
  • I need to read multiple excel files, extract a column from each and compose a new file
    So to get this out of the way first, xlrd has less features than openpyxl and in addition only works with the old '.xls' format, not the newer '.xlsx' format. Even on the xlrd's Github repo it says: 'Please use openpyxl where you can... '. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Sending Bulk SMS using Africas Talking, Python and Excel
    There are few alternative libraries for reading and writing excel files: Pandas, Xlrd , openpyxl among others. In the end I settled for openpyxl as I had the most experience Using it and it had support for .xlsx files. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago

Tracking Codeship since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to python xlrd and Codeship

When comparing python xlrd and Codeship, you can also consider the following products.