Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Pyruse VS SSHGuard

Compare Pyruse VS SSHGuard and see what are their differences

Pyruse logo Pyruse

pyruse - Lightweight replacement to both epylog and fail2ban

SSHGuard logo SSHGuard

SSHGuard monitors services through their logging activity.
  • Pyruse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-25
  • SSHGuard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-06

Pyruse features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

SSHGuard features and specs

  • Log Monitoring
    SSHGuard monitors log files for suspicious activity related to SSH, ensuring that any potential intrusion attempts are detected promptly.
  • Automatic Blocking
    It can automatically block IP addresses that show malicious behavior, reducing the risk of repeated attacks from the same source.
  • Lightweight
    SSHGuard is lightweight and efficient in terms of resource usage, making it suitable for a variety of server environments.
  • Compatibility
    SSHGuard is compatible with multiple log formats and integrates well with existing firewall systems such as iptables and pf.
  • Scalability
    It can handle a large number of log entries and is suitable for both small and large server infrastructures.

Possible disadvantages of SSHGuard

  • Limited Protocol Support
    While SSHGuard is effective for SSH attacks, its support for other protocols is limited compared to more comprehensive security solutions.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration may be challenging for users unfamiliar with firewall rules and log formats.
  • Not a Replacement for Comprehensive Security
    SSHGuard should not be relied upon as the sole security measure; it's best used as part of a layered security strategy.
  • False Positives
    There is a potential risk of false positives, which may lead to legitimate IPs being blocked unintentionally.

Pyruse videos

No Pyruse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

SSHGuard videos

How To install SSHGuard On Centos 7.3

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pyruse and SSHGuard)
Cyber Security
22 22%
78% 78
Monitoring Tools
22 22%
78% 78
Web Application Security
18 18%
82% 82
Network Security
39 39%
61% 61

User comments

Share your experience with using Pyruse and SSHGuard. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SSHGuard seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pyruse mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Pyruse yet. Tracking of Pyruse recommendations started around Mar 2021.

SSHGuard mentions (1)

  • Whats with all the hacking/attacks?
    There are now better defensive tools (I use https://sshguard.net/); not that there are any accounts on this system that are vulnerable, but it does keep the relevant logfile from growing to astronomical size. Source: over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pyruse and SSHGuard, you can also consider the following products

Fail2ban - Intrusion prevention framework

CrowdSec - CrowdSec is a security automation engine, using both local IP behavior detection & our community-driven IP reputation database.

RdpGuard - RdpGuard allows you to protect your Remote Desktop (RDP), POP3, FTP, SMTP, IMAP, MSSQL, MySQL, VoIP/SIP from brute-force attacks by blocking attacker's IP address. Fail2Ban for Windows.

Denyhosts - The idea of denying access to SSH servers is nothing new and I was inspired by many other scripts...

win2ban - win2ban is a Fail2ban implementation for Windows systems.

IPBan - Block hacking attempts on RDP, SSH, SMTP and much more