Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PyQt VS QuickJS

Compare PyQt VS QuickJS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

PyQt logo PyQt

Riverbank | Software | PyQt | What is PyQt?

QuickJS logo QuickJS

Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and JavaScript Compilers
  • PyQt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18
  • QuickJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-20

PyQt features and specs

  • Comprehensive UI library
    PyQt provides a wide range of UI components, from basic widgets to advanced tools. This allows for the creation of highly sophisticated interfaces.
  • Cross-platform
    Applications built with PyQt can run on different operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux without requiring significant changes in the code.
  • Integration with Qt Designer
    Developers can use Qt Designer to design and implement their UIs visually, which can then be seamlessly integrated with Python code in PyQt.
  • Powerful event handling
    PyQt includes a highly efficient event handling system that makes it easy to manage user interactions and system events.
  • Good documentation and community support
    PyQt is well-documented, and there's a large community of developers who can provide support and share resources.
  • Python-specific advantages
    Leveraging Python's simplicity and readability, PyQt allows for rapid development and easy maintenance of applications.

Possible disadvantages of PyQt

  • License considerations
    PyQt is available under the GPL and a commercial license. If you want to create proprietary software without open-sourcing your code, you need to purchase a commercial license.
  • Steep learning curve
    While PyQt is powerful, it can have a steep learning curve for newcomers, particularly those who are not familiar with Qt and its paradigms.
  • Performance overhead
    Being a binding for Qt, some operations may have extra overhead compared to native Qt applications written in C++.
  • Dependency on external libraries
    PyQt relies on the Qt library, which means that you have to manage and distribute these dependencies along with your application.
  • Large binary sizes
    Applications created with PyQt can result in relatively large binary sizes because of the included Qt binaries.
  • Fragmentation of tools
    There can be fragmentation concerns, as PyQt must stay in sync with Qt, and different versions of Qt may introduce changes that are not immediately reflected in PyQt.

QuickJS features and specs

  • Lightweight
    QuickJS is designed to be lightweight with a small footprint, making it easy to embed in applications and suitable for resource-constrained environments.
  • Fast Startup Time
    QuickJS offers very fast startup times, which can be beneficial for applications that require quick script execution without a long initialization period.
  • Full ES2020 Support
    QuickJS supports the full ES2020 specification, providing modern JavaScript features and syntax, which is advantageous for developers who want to use the latest JavaScript features.
  • Embeddability
    Being easy to integrate into other applications or systems, QuickJS provides a simple C API, which facilitates embedding it in various software and platforms.
  • Single File Distribution
    QuickJS can be distributed as a single file, simplifying packaging and distribution without needing external dependencies.
  • Memory Efficiency
    Its memory efficient design allows QuickJS to run scripts in environments with limited memory resources, making it suitable for IoT devices and embedded systems.

Possible disadvantages of QuickJS

  • Limited Ecosystem
    QuickJS, being a relatively new and niche project, has a smaller ecosystem compared to more established JavaScript engines like V8, which means fewer libraries and community resources are available.
  • Performance
    While QuickJS is efficient, it may not deliver the same high-performance execution as more mature engines like V8, especially in applications requiring intensive computational processing.
  • Lack of Long-term Support
    QuickJS may not have the same level of long-term support and ongoing development as larger projects maintained by large companies or communities.
  • Single-threaded
    QuickJS runs in a single thread, which can be a limitation for applications that require multithreading support for parallel processing.
  • Limited Debugging Tools
    Compared to more popular JavaScript engines, QuickJS has fewer debugging tools and integrations, which might make development and troubleshooting more challenging.

Analysis of PyQt

Overall verdict

  • PyQt is considered a good choice for developers looking to create robust, high-performance desktop applications with Python. Its ability to leverage the powerful Qt framework makes it a reliable option for both beginners and experienced developers.

Why this product is good

  • PyQt is a set of Python bindings for the Qt libraries, allowing developers to create cross-platform applications with native look and feel. It provides comprehensive support for building GUI applications and includes an extensive range of modules and functions, making it suitable for both simple and complex projects. Additionally, it benefits from a large and active community, extensive documentation, and commercial support from Riverbank Computing.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for cross-platform GUI toolkits
  • Projects that require a modern, native look and feel
  • Development teams requiring robust commercial support
  • Python developers interested in leveraging a well-documented and extensive framework

PyQt videos

Python Top 3 GUI Frameworks In 2019 (PyQt5, wxPython, TKinter)

More videos:

QuickJS videos

QuickJS - IO, axios, redaxios, fetch

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PyQt and QuickJS)
Rapid Application Development
Application And Data
0 0%
100% 100
Development Tools
71 71%
29% 29
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PyQt and QuickJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PyQt and QuickJS

PyQt Reviews

25 Python Frameworks to Master
PyQt is one of the most popular sets of Python bindings for the Qt cross-platform application framework. This framework perfectly combines the simplicity of Python as a general-purpose language and the powerful Qt application framework built in C++.
Source: kinsta.com
Which Python GUI library should you use? Comparing the Python GUI libraries available in 2023
Before the Qt Company (under Nokia) released the officially supported PySide library in 2009, Riverbank Computing had released PyQt in 1998. The main difference between these two libraries is in licensing. The free-to-use version of PyQt is licensed under GNU General Public License (GPL) v3 but PySide is licensed under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). This means...
10 Best Python Libraries for GUI
Developed by Riverbank Computing, PyQt5 is one of the most popular Python frameworks for GUI. The PyQt package is built around the Qt framework, which is a cross-platform framework used for creating various applications on different platforms.
Source: www.unite.ai
Top 10 Python GUI Frameworks for Developers
When it comes to creating GUIs, the PyQt5 arsenal offers the impressive QtGui and the QtDesigner module, which provide numerous visual elements that the developer can implement with a simple drag and drop. Of course, the option of creating these elements by code also exists, allowing you to create both small-scale as well as large-scale applications with ease. Pythonโ€™s...

QuickJS Reviews

We have no reviews of QuickJS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, QuickJS seems to be a lot more popular than PyQt. While we know about 46 links to QuickJS, we've tracked only 4 mentions of PyQt. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PyQt mentions (4)

  • Python vs. JavaScript: Is It a Fair Comparison?
    JavaScript is a clear winner in the category of mobile development. There are some niche frameworks to do mobile development with Pythonโ€”like Kivy and PyQTโ€”but pretty much nobody uses them. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • what would be the best looking GUI framework to develop a desktop python application? (other than Tkinter)
    If none of those are to your liking, you can use PyQT (or Pyside) but the learning curve is much steeper. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Is there a "Windows Forms" GUI designer for Python?
    Also, there is the PyQt module which is a comprehensive set of Python bindings for the Qt GUI. It has Qt Designer. Source: almost 5 years ago
  • Best way to install qutebrowser?
    As for PyQt, that's developed entirely independently from Qt (by Riverbank Computing). The major/minor versions usually line up with the respective Qt releases (since the Qt release introduces new APIs, so a new PyQt release is needed to expose those to Python). However, it's versioned independently, and a new patch release of PyQt might be needed before/without Qt releasing a new patch release. For more details,... Source: over 5 years ago

QuickJS mentions (46)

  • Vim 9.2 Released
    You don't need V8 for running JS for scripting, you have quickjs[1] or mquickjs[2] for example. You might have problems importing npm packages, but as we can see from lua plugins you don't even need support for package managers. Performance is not as good as luajit, but it is good enough [1]: https://bellard.org/quickjs/ [2]: https://github.com/bellard/mquickjs. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Fabrice Bellard Releases MicroQuickJS
    - QuickJS: https://bellard.org/quickjs/ Legendary. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Building a JavaScript Runtime from Scratch using C
    For those who would like a true "from scratch" implementation of JavaScript, Fabrice Bellard's QuickJS [1] is clean, readable and approachable. It's a full implementation of modern JavaScript in a straightforward project, not nearly as complex or difficult as V8. [1] https://bellard.org/quickjs/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • The many, many, many JavaScript runtimes of the last decade
    I see a few mentions of QuickJS, but they all refer to the fork of Bellard's QuickJS https://bellard.org/quickjs/, which I think deserves a mention. It seems to be still active (last release 2025-04-26, GitHub mirror at https://github.com/bellard/quickjs shows some activity). - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • SQLite JavaScript: Extend your database with JavaScript
    This is a fantastic approach. BTW, it looks like the js engine is "QuickJS" [0]. (I'm not familiar with it myself.) I like it because sqlite by itself lacks a host language. (e.g., Oracle's plsql, Postgreses pgplsql, Sqlserver's t-sql, etc). That is: code that runs on compute that is local to your storage. That's a nice flexible design -- you can choose whatever language you want. But quite typically you... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PyQt and QuickJS, you can also consider the following products

Tkinter - Tkinter is a Python wrapper for Tcl/Tk that offers classes to create various graphical user interfaces.

Sciter - Embeddable HTML/CSS/script engine

PySimpleGUI - A simple to use GUI that can create custom GUIs

nuitka - Nuitka is a Python compiler.

GTK - GTK+ is a multi-platform toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces.

DaisyUI - Free UI components plugin for Tailwind CSS