Software Alternatives & Startups

PuTTY VS Steampipe

Compare PuTTY VS Steampipe and see what are their differences

PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Rating
0 reviews
Steampipe

Steampipe: select * from cloud; The extensible SQL interface to your favorite cloud APIs select * from AWS, Azure, GCP, Github, Slack etc.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Steampipe seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 43 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 43
SSH popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 37

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

PuTTY
Steampipe
Website chiark.greenend.org.uk steampipe.io
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

PuTTY 5 features
Steampipe 5 features
  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.
  • Unified Interface
    Steampipe provides a unified SQL-based interface to query data from various cloud services and APIs, simplifying data access.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, Steampipe allows for community contributions, transparency, and flexibility in adapting the tool to specific needs.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    Steampipe has a growing ecosystem of plugins that enable easy integration with numerous services, enhancing its versatility.
  • Real-Time Data Access
    It facilitates real-time querying of data from live APIs, which is beneficial for up-to-date insights and monitoring.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Steampipe is designed to work on multiple platforms, including Windows, MacOS, and Linux, making it accessible to a wide range of users.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, requiring a good understanding of SQL and the specific APIs being used.
  • Performance Overhead
    Query performance may be impacted due to the abstraction layer and real-time consolidation of data from multiple sources.
  • Limited Community Support
    As a relatively new tool, Steampipe may have limited community support and fewer resources compared to more established alternatives.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple queries against APIs and cloud services can become resource intensive, potentially increasing costs and load on systems.
  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with SQL may face a learning curve in effectively utilizing Steampipe for querying different data sources.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

PuTTY
Steampipe

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

No analysis of Steampipe yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

PuTTY 3 videos + Add
Steampipe 3 videos + Add

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos

  • - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

Superbooth 2023: Erica Synths - Steampipe

More videos

  • - BEST SYNTHS @ SUPERBOOTH23: PWM Mantis, UDO Super Gemini, Erica Synths STEAMPIPE… and more
  • - Erica Synths STEAMPIPE The Synth with no oscillators!

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
PuTTY
Steampipe
100% 100%
SSH
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using PuTTY and Steampipe. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

PuTTY no reviews yet
Steampipe no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Steampipe yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

PuTTY 0 mentions
Steampipe 43 mentions

Tracking PuTTY since Mar 2021.

  • Executable Is a SQLite Database
    Check out https://steampipe.io/, available as sqlite/postgtesql extensions. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Build API integrations with SQL and YAML – no SaaS lock-in, no drag-and-drop UIs
    The request / data fetching is interesting in how "easy" it is to write. I did basic perusal of the examples, but I'd be interested to see what it looks like with rate-limited endpoints and concurrent requests. Another tangentially... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Cyphernetes: A Query Language for Kubernetes
    I really really like Steampipe to do this kind of query: https://steampipe.io, which is essentially PostgreSQL (literally) to query many different kind of APIs, which means you have access to all PostgreSQL's SQL language can offer to... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to PuTTY and Steampipe

When comparing PuTTY and Steampipe, you can also consider the following products.