Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

PuTTY VS Process Lasso

Compare PuTTY VS Process Lasso and see what are their differences

PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Process Lasso

Process Lasso is NOT yet another task manager.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Rclone UI
The cross-platform GUI for Rclone. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Process Lasso seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 129 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 129
SSH popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 70

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

PuTTY
Process Lasso
Website chiark.greenend.org.uk bitsum.com
Listed in
SSH Server Management Server Configuration And Automation Cloud Computing +1
Monitoring Tools Command Line Tools Performance Monitoring Device Management +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

PuTTY 5 features
Process Lasso 5 features
  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.
  • Improved System Responsiveness
    Process Lasso dynamically adjusts the priority of running processes, ensuring that system-critical tasks are not bogged down by resource-heavy applications. This leads to a more responsive and smoother computing experience.
  • ProBalance Technology
    The proprietary ProBalance algorithm intelligently balances CPU usage, preventing system stalls and ensuring that no single application consumes too many CPU cycles, which is especially useful when running multiple applications simultaneously.
  • Automation Features
    Process Lasso offers extensive automation features such as rules for process priority, automatic termination of certain applications, and power profile switching, allowing for a highly customized and automated system management experience.
  • Energy Efficiency
    By optimizing CPU usage and reducing unnecessary background processes, Process Lasso can improve energy efficiency, which is especially advantageous for laptop users aiming to extend battery life.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Process Lasso provides a comprehensive yet intuitive user interface, making it easy for both novice and expert users to navigate and utilize its features effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, the array of options and features can be overwhelming for new users, requiring some time and effort to understand and utilize fully.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of Process Lasso has limited functionality compared to the Pro version, which may push users towards purchasing a license to unlock its full potential.
  • Resource Usage
    While Process Lasso aims to optimize system performance, it itself is an additional background process, which means it consumes some system resources, although minimal.
  • Complexity of Advanced Features
    The advanced features, such as custom rules and automation tasks, can be quite complex to configure correctly, potentially leading to unintended consequences if not set up properly.
  • Cost
    For those requiring the full feature set, the cost of the Pro version can be considered a downside, particularly for casual users who may not need the advanced functionalities.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

PuTTY
Process Lasso

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Process Lasso is generally considered a good tool for optimizing system performance.

Why this product is good

  • Process Lasso is praised for its ability to manage and optimize CPU usage through its ProBalance technology, which prevents system slowdowns by adjusting the priority of background processes. It provides features like automated rules, power profile automation, and performance mode, which enhance the user's computer performance without manual intervention.

Recommended for

  • Users experiencing frequent system slowdowns or stalls due to high CPU usage.
  • Gamers looking for improved performance and reduced input lag during gameplay.
  • IT professionals and power users who need advanced tools for system and process management.
  • Anyone looking for a set-and-forget solution to maintain system responsiveness under heavy load.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

PuTTY 3 videos + Add
Process Lasso 2 videos + Add

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos

  • - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

Is Process Lasso Worth it? | SMT OFF vs Process Lasso vs Windows Affinity | Ryzen 5 1600

More videos

  • - Using Process Lasso to avoid gaming mode reboots on Ryzen ThreadRipper

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
PuTTY
Process Lasso
100% 100%
SSH
0% 0%
0% 0%
Monitoring Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Server Management
0% 0%
0% 0%
Command Line Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using PuTTY and Process Lasso. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

PuTTY no reviews yet
Process Lasso no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Process Lasso yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

PuTTY 0 mentions
Process Lasso 129 mentions

Tracking PuTTY since Mar 2021.

  • skype is using 20/30% of my CPU all the time even when its on the idle mode.
    If that helps then you can try Process Lasso to automate this. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • CS2 Performance - Intel 12/13/14gen users should DISABLE E-Cores!
    CoreDirector is pretty straight forward and easy to use, but on my machine it caused micro-stutters even if I had higher frames. I used Process Lasso to do this, which should be the same thing CoreDirector does, but it worked better for me. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Another (possible) Fix for the 5 seconds stuttering (Even on SSD)
    If BES doesn't work for you, you can try Project Lasso for free: https://bitsum.com/. On this one, I've set the CPU Limiter to when the process reach 85% for 2 seconds, limit by 1 core for 1 second. You can also reduce the CPU affinity... Source: almost 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to PuTTY and Process Lasso

When comparing PuTTY and Process Lasso, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...