Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

PuTTY VS Persistent SSH

Compare PuTTY VS Persistent SSH and see what are their differences

PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Persistent SSH

Persistent SSH is SSH tunnel manager for a Windows systems.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Bunny.net
BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Persistent SSH seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
SSH popularity
91% vs 9%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 66

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

PuTTY
Persistent SSH
Website chiark.greenend.org.uk persistentssh.com
Listed in
SSH Server Management Server Configuration And Automation Cloud Computing +1
SSH Server Management Terminal Tools Server Configuration And Automation +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

PuTTY 5 features
Persistent SSH 5 features
  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.
  • Reliable Connectivity
    Persistent SSH provides a stable and continuous SSH connection, which is beneficial for applications that require uninterrupted connectivity.
  • Session Management
    It offers robust session management features, allowing users to resume their work seamlessly even after network interruptions.
  • Security Features
    The platform incorporates strong encryption and authentication methods, ensuring secure data transmission over SSH connections.
  • Ease of Use
    Persistent SSH is designed to be user-friendly, making it easy for both technical and non-technical users to establish and maintain SSH connections.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple operating systems, providing flexibility and accessibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    The service may involve subscription fees or usage costs, which can be a downside for users looking for free alternatives.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    While it is user-friendly, some initial setup and configuration might be complex for users unfamiliar with SSH or networking concepts.
  • Internet Dependency
    The effectiveness of Persistent SSH relies on internet connectivity, which might pose issues in areas with poor network infrastructure.
  • Limited Features Compared to Alternatives
    Some alternatives might offer more comprehensive features or integrations that are not available with Persistent SSH.
  • Potential Security Risks if Misconfigured
    If not properly configured, there may be security vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious actors.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

PuTTY
Persistent SSH

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

No analysis of Persistent SSH yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

PuTTY 3 videos + Add
Persistent SSH 0 videos + Add

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos

  • - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

No Persistent SSH videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
PuTTY
Persistent SSH
91% 91%
SSH
9% 9%
100% 100%
Server Management
0% 0%
0% 0%
Network & Admin
100% 100%
100% 100%
Server Configuration And Automation
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using PuTTY and Persistent SSH. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

PuTTY no reviews yet
Persistent SSH no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Persistent SSH yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

PuTTY 0 mentions
Persistent SSH 1 mention

Tracking PuTTY since Mar 2021.

  • ssh tunneling
    KiTTy (A PuTTy derivative) has support for SSH-tunnels build-in. If you like the results then you can use something like persistant SSH tunnels (or a FOSS alternative) to maintain them. Source: over 5 years ago

Alternatives to PuTTY and Persistent SSH

When comparing PuTTY and Persistent SSH, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...