Software Alternatives & Startups

PuTTY VS Fieldpoint

Compare PuTTY VS Fieldpoint and see what are their differences

PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Rating
0 reviews
Fieldpoint

Cloud-based field service and project management software

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

SSH popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 28

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

PuTTY
Fieldpoint
Website chiark.greenend.org.uk fieldpoint.net
Pricing —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

PuTTY 5 features
Fieldpoint 4 features
  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.
  • Comprehensive Features
    Fieldpoint provides a wide range of features including work order management, contract management, and project management capabilities, which are valuable for various service management needs.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform integrates seamlessly with other software solutions like Microsoft Dynamics and QuickBooks, allowing for better data flow and operational efficiency.
  • Mobile Accessibility
    Fieldpoint offers a mobile application, enabling field technicians to access information and update statuses in real-time while on the go.
  • Customer Support
    The company provides reliable customer support services to assist users in troubleshooting and maximizing the use of the software.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity for New Users
    Due to its comprehensive set of features, new users might find the platform complex and experience a steep learning curve.
  • Cost Consideration
    The pricing of Fieldpoint can be relatively high for small businesses, making it a more viable option for medium to large enterprises.
  • Customization Limitations
    While Fieldpoint offers various features, customization options can be limited, which might restrict certain businesses from tailoring the platform to their specific needs.
  • Setup Time
    The initial setup and implementation of Fieldpoint can be time-consuming, requiring dedicated time and resources to configure the system fully.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

PuTTY
Fieldpoint

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

No analysis of Fieldpoint yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

PuTTY 3 videos + Add
Fieldpoint 3 videos + Add

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos

  • - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

Scheduling Resources for Work Orders Using Fieldpoint

More videos

  • - Fieldpoint MobilePro - Evolving Field Service Mobility
  • - SEVR 125 fieldpoint review.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
PuTTY
Fieldpoint
100% 100%
SSH
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using PuTTY and Fieldpoint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

PuTTY no reviews yet
Fieldpoint no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Fieldpoint yet. Be the first one to post

Alternatives to PuTTY and Fieldpoint

When comparing PuTTY and Fieldpoint, you can also consider the following products.

  • MobaXterm

    Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

    Compare MobaXterm to PuTTY or Fieldpoint:

  • Jobber

    Jobber’s field service scheduling software and app is the best way to organize your service business. Quote, schedule, invoice, and get paid—all in one place. Our easy-to-use app powers your sales, operations, and customer service.

    Compare Jobber to PuTTY or Fieldpoint:

  • KiTTY

    KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.

    Compare KiTTY to PuTTY or Fieldpoint:

  • EyeOnTask

    EyeOnTask is an all-in-one feature-rich cloud-based mobile workforce management software solution that helps field service companies and workers efficiently manage clients, inventory, jobs, and invoices in a single location.

    Compare EyeOnTask to PuTTY or Fieldpoint:

  • ConEmu

    ConEmu-Maximus5 is a full-featured local terminal for Windows devs, admins and users. Get better console window with tabs, splits, Quake style, copy+paste, DosBox and PuTTY integration, and much more.

    Compare ConEmu to PuTTY or Fieldpoint:

  • ServiceTitan

    #1 Management Software for Home Service Contractors.

    Compare ServiceTitan to PuTTY or Fieldpoint: