Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

PuTTY VS BunkerWeb

Compare PuTTY VS BunkerWeb and see what are their differences

PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
BunkerWeb

BunkerWeb is a next-generation and open-source Web Application Firewall (WAF).

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
BusinessLOG SOC
A centralized log management and SIEM platform built for compliance, auditing, anomaly detection, and infrastructure visibility. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

SSH popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 75

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

PuTTY
BunkerWeb
Website chiark.greenend.org.uk bunkerweb.io
Pricing —
Open source
Platforms —
Docker Linux Kubernetes Swarm +1
Listed in
SSH Server Management Server Configuration And Automation Cloud Computing +1
Cyber Security Web Application Security Web Application Protection Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy +1

About PuTTY and BunkerWeb

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

PuTTY
BunkerWeb

No description of PuTTY yet.

Being a full-featured web server (based on NGINX under the hood), it will protect your web services to make them "secure by default". BunkerWeb integrates seamlessly into your existing environments (Linux, Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, …) and is fully configurable (don't panic, there is an awesome...

Read more about BunkerWeb

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

PuTTY 5 features
BunkerWeb 6 features
  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.
  • Easy integration into existing environments
    support for Linux, Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Ansible, Vagrant, ...
  • Highly customizable
    enable, disable and configure features easily to meet your use case
  • Secure by default
    offers out-of-the-box and hassle-free minimal security for your web services
  • Awesome web UI
    keep control of everything more efficiently without the need of the CLI
  • Plugin system
    extend BunkerWeb to meet your own use-cases
  • Free as in "freedom"
    licensed under the free AGPLv3 license

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

PuTTY
BunkerWeb

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

No analysis of BunkerWeb yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

PuTTY 3 videos + Add
BunkerWeb 2 videos + Add

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos

  • - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

BunkerWeb - user interface demo

More videos

  • - BunkerWeb - fooling automated scanners/tools

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
PuTTY
BunkerWeb
100% 100%
SSH
0% 0%
0% 0%
Web Application Security
100% 100%
100% 100%
Server Management
0% 0%
0% 0%
Cyber Security
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing PuTTY and BunkerWeb.

What's the story behind your product?

BunkerWeb's answer:

There was no Open-Source Web Application Firewall that meet our own use cases, that's why we decided to create BunkerWeb.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

BunkerWeb's answer:

  • NGINX
  • LUA
  • Python
  • Docker
  • Linux
  • Kubernetes

What makes your product unique?

BunkerWeb's answer:

  • Next-Generation Web Application Firewall
  • Security by default for web services
  • Free as in "freedom", licensed under the free AGPLv3 license

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

BunkerWeb's answer:

  • Tech companies
  • Governments
  • Startups
  • Freelancers

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

BunkerWeb's answer:

  • Quickly test it because it's Open Source
  • Install on your own server, keep your data safe
  • Professional services : support, training, development, ...

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

BunkerWeb's answer:

  • SaaS or web app vendors
  • IT outsourcing company
  • Web agencies
  • Security teams
  • System and network administrators

User comments

Share your experience with using PuTTY and BunkerWeb. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

PuTTY no reviews yet
BunkerWeb no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of BunkerWeb yet. Be the first one to post

Alternatives to PuTTY and BunkerWeb

When comparing PuTTY and BunkerWeb, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...