pttrns VS cppq

• Ease of Use
  Pttrns offers a user-friendly interface allowing designers to quickly search and find design patterns for mobile and web apps.
• High-Quality Examples
  The platform provides high-quality, curated design examples from well-known apps, helping designers implement industry standards.
• Inspiration
  Pttrns serves as a source of inspiration for designers, showcasing a variety of design styles and approaches.
• Categorization
  Design patterns are well-categorized, making it easy for users to find specific UI patterns based on their needs.
• Up-to-date
  The platform regularly updates its library with new and trending design patterns, ensuring users have access to the latest designs.

Possible disadvantages

• Subscription Cost
  While some content is free, full access to Pttrns requires a subscription, which might not be suitable for all budgets.
• Limited Interactivity
  The examples are typically static images or screenshots, lacking interactive elements that could better demonstrate the user experience.
• Over-Reliance on Examples
  Designers might become overly reliant on the provided examples and may neglect creating original and innovative designs.
• Lack of Detailed Explanations
  The platform focuses more on showcasing finished designs and might not provide in-depth explanations behind design choices.
• Mobile-Centric
  Pttrns primarily focuses on mobile app design patterns, which might be a limitation for designers looking for web or other platform-specific patterns.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Pttrns: Mobile Design Patterns

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• App or Software to organise a UI Pattern Library

  While I'm aware that there are current resources out there such as Mobbin or Pttrns, I have been taking my own screenshots for a while now and it would be great to be able to set up tags to categorise and organise these. Source: over 5 years ago

• Does anyone else find Behance and Dribbble absolutely useless?

  Https://pttrns.com/ is a similar site but the quality went down a bit. Source: over 5 years ago

• UX gallery, similar to component.gallery

  Maybe try mobbin.design or https://pttrns.com/. Source: over 5 years ago

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.