Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Proxyman.io VS runc

Compare Proxyman.io VS runc and see what are their differences

Proxyman.io logo Proxyman.io

Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

runc logo runc

CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification - opencontainers/runc
  • Proxyman.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-25

Modern and Delightful HTTP Debugging Proxy Proxyman is a native, high-performance macOS application, which enables developers to observe and manipulate HTTP/HTTPS requests.

  • runc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-21

Proxyman.io features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Proxyman.io provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface, making it accessible for both beginners and advanced users.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple platforms including macOS, Windows, and Linux, ensuring a broad range of users can utilize the tool.
  • Real-time Traffic Interception
    Proxyman.io offers real-time traffic interception and inspection, enabling users to debug and analyze traffic as it happens.
  • HTTPS Decryption
    The tool supports HTTPS decryption, allowing users to view encrypted traffic for more thorough analysis.
  • Customizable Filters
    Users can set up customizable filters to focus on specific types of traffic or protocols, enhancing productivity and efficiency.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Proxyman.io provides detailed documentation and tutorials, helping users to make the most of the software.
  • Active Community and Support
    The tool has an active community and responsive support team, providing assistance and updates regularly.

Possible disadvantages of Proxyman.io

  • Cost
    While Proxyman.io offers a free trial, the full version is paid, which might be a barrier for some users or smaller organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, new users might still experience a learning curve to fully utilize all features.
  • Resource Intensive
    The application can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down the system when intercepting high volumes of traffic.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version has limitations in terms of features and volume of traffic it can handle, which may necessitate purchasing the paid version for extensive use.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Like any software, it can have occasional bugs or performance issues, although these are generally addressed quickly by the development team.

runc features and specs

  • Standardization
    runc is part of the Open Containers Initiative (OCI), promoting standardization across container runtimes. This ensures interoperability and broad community support.
  • Lightweight
    As a lightweight and fast CLI tool, runc provides a minimal runtime for environments where resource efficiency is critical.
  • Security
    runc adheres to principles of secure software development and incorporates Linux kernel features like namespaces and cgroups to enhance security.
  • Broad Adoption
    As the reference implementation for OCI, runc is widely adopted and tested in production environments, ensuring reliability.
  • Flexibility
    runc offers the flexibility to handle low-level container configurations, making it suitable for advanced users needing granular control.

Possible disadvantages of runc

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The low-level nature of runc can be daunting for beginners who might prefer higher-level tools like Docker that abstract away complexities.
  • Minimalist Design
    While its simplicity is an advantage, runc lacks some of the advanced features and orchestration capabilities found in other container platforms.
  • Manual Configurations
    Users need to manually handle configurations, which can be error-prone and time-consuming compared to automated solutions.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    runc does not provide direct integration with tools and platforms by default, requiring additional setup for comprehensive ecosystem support.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to complete container platforms, runc offers fewer built-in features, requiring supplementary tools to achieve similar functionalities.

Analysis of Proxyman.io

Overall verdict

  • Proxyman.io is generally considered a good tool for developers in need of a robust and intuitive proxy tool. It provides essential features for network traffic analysis with a clean and modern interface.

Why this product is good

  • Proxyman.io is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and powerful features that make it an effective tool for web debugging. It supports a range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, and WebSocket, and offers functionalities such as breakpoints, request/response modification, and SSL proxying. Its integration with MacOS makes it a preferred choice for developers in that ecosystem.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • Mobile developers
  • Security researchers
  • Quality assurance engineers

Proxyman.io videos

No Proxyman.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

runc videos

2/21/19 RunC Vulnerability Gives Root Access on Container Systems| AT&T ThreatTraq

More videos:

  • Review - Demo MONEY,TIME - RunC

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Proxyman.io and runc)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100
Proxy
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers

User comments

Share your experience with using Proxyman.io and runc. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Proxyman.io and runc

Proxyman.io Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Proxyman just like Paw is a native macOS web debugging proxy application. This tool stands as an intermediary or a man-in-the-middle server. With its built-in macOS setup, you can capture, inspect and get around HTTP(s) traffic, request, and responses easily. What set Proxyman aside from Paw is the fact that it is more advance in functionalities.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
Similar to the above-mentioned Paw, Proxyman is a premium native macOS web debugging proxy application.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
On the pricing front, Requestly strikes a balance between affordability and functionality. It is an open-source tool, offering freemium to individual developers and affordable pricing plans for team collaboration. We have also clearly differentiated how Requestly differs from Wireshark and other web debugging tools like Proxyman, Modheader, and HTTP ToolKit separately.
Source: dev.to

runc Reviews

We have no reviews of runc yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Proxyman.io should be more popular than runc. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Proxyman.io mentions (27)

  • Charles Proxy
    I don't have elaborate needs and have used Charles for many years. A few years ago I switched to https://proxyman.com and found it easier to use. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Essential Mobile Testing Tools: A Developer's Complete Guide
    Network analysis tools like Charles Proxy and Proxyman provide essential debugging capabilities for mobile applications. These tools intercept and analyze all network traffic, enabling detailed inspection of API communications. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Catching useful errors when parsing JSON fails in Swift
    Armed with this you could now investigate the raw JSON using HTTP proxying (I like to use ProxyMan for this), and/or talk to the back-end team, see if they've made some changes and are aware of the breakage in the contract between client and server. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Pฤkiki Proxy โ€“ An intercepting proxy for penetration pesting
    I previously used Proxyman [1] on iOS to the http requests send over TLS. It worked rather nicely. Proxyman in this case starts a VPN which handles all the traffic. It uses custom certificate to decrypt the messages. [1] https://proxyman.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • A collection of useful Mac Apps
    Proxyman - Price: Free (optional paid plans available) Modern and intuitive HTTP/HTTPS debugging proxy app for macOS. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

runc mentions (11)

  • Setup multi node kubernetes cluster using kubeadm
    For kubeadm , kubetlet , kubectl should same version package in this lab I used v1.31 to have 1.31.7 References: Https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/networking/ports-and-protocols/ Https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/tools/kubeadm/install-kubeadm/ Https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/releases/... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers
    Previously I wrote about the multiple variants of Docker and also the dependencies behind the Docker daemon. One of the dependencies was the container runtime called runc. That is what creates the usual containers we are all familiar with. When you use Docker, this is the default runtime, which is understandable since it was started by Docker, Inc. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • You run containers, not dockers - Discussing Docker variants, components and versioning
    Now we have dockerd which uses containerd, but containerd will not create containers directly. It needs a runtime and the default runtime is runc, but that can be changed. Containerd actually doesn't have to know the parameters of the runtime. There is a shim process between containerd and runc, so containerd knows the parameters of the shim, and the shim knows the parameters of runc or other runtimes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products
    It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Why did the Krustlet project die?
    Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Proxyman.io and runc, you can also consider the following products

Charles Proxy - HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

Apache Thrift - An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images