ProxyCompass's answer

• 3proxy
• Squid

Emisar.dev's answer:

The hosted control plane and operator interface use Elixir, Phoenix, LiveView, PostgreSQL, and Tailwind CSS. The host runner and MCP bridge are written in Go. Action packs use YAML and JSON Schema, while production infrastructure is managed with Terraform on Google Cloud. The system communicates through MCP, OAuth 2.1, TLS, and WebSockets.

ProxyCompass's answer

Competitive pricing starting at just 6 cents per IP, support for all popular protocols including SOCKS5, HTTPS, UDP, availability in 20+ countries, and no limits on bandwidth or concurrent connections make ProxyCompass the smart choice over competitors.

Emisar.dev's answer:

Choose emisar when you want an agent to keep investigating and handling routine operations without handing it SSH credentials or supervising every call. Compared with raw shell access, copy-paste workflows, or one-off MCP servers, emisar provides reviewed action contracts, host-level enforcement, risk-based policy, scoped access, approvals, pack integrity checks, and a durable audit trail. It is built specifically for governed infrastructure access rather than generic automation.

ProxyCompass's answer

• Novus IT Solutions (Switzerland)
• Analytic Company GmbH (USA, Germany)
• AdVision Digital GmbH (Germany)

Emisar.dev's answer:

• Blitz.gg - game analytics for billions of matches and a pretty large infrastructure.

ProxyCompass's answer

The story behind ProxyCompass began with our origins in the hosting service industry. Initially, we provided hosting solutions tailored to a wide range of clients, from individual webmasters to large-scale businesses. Over time, we recognized a growing demand for more specialized internet anonymity and data access solutions amidst an increasingly complex and restricted online landscape.

Emisar.dev's answer:

Founder Andrii Dryga spent a decade working as a CTO, full-stack engineer, SRE, and DevOps engineer. He experienced the cost of running the wrong command on the wrong cluster, while also seeing AI solve operational problems in seconds. emisar grew from the need to preserve both truths: AI agents are useful, and production access must remain bounded. Its answer is to give agents a reviewed catalog of operations instead of a blank terminal.

ProxyCompass's answer

Our primary audience consists of IT companies that specialize in data collection and analysis. These organizations leverage our proxy services to efficiently gather vast amounts of information from various online sources, which they then analyze to derive valuable insights for their operations or their clients'. Our services are particularly suited for businesses involved in market research, competitive intelligence, search engine optimization, content aggregation, and cybersecurity, among other data-centric activities.

Emisar.dev's answer:

emisar is for SRE, DevOps, platform engineering, infrastructure, and security teams that want AI agents to inspect and operate production systems. It is especially relevant to teams managing multiple Linux hosts, clusters, databases, cloud services, or regulated environments where unrestricted shell access and incomplete audit records are unacceptable.

ProxyCompass's answer

ProxyCompass stands out for its highly competitive pricing. We ensure transparency with no hidden fees, guaranteeing that clients won't face unexpected bills. Our extensive proxy packages are offered at very affordable prices, providing significant value to our customers.

Emisar.dev's answer:

emisar lets AI agents work on real infrastructure without giving them a shell. Agents choose from a finite catalog of typed, versioned actions. Policy decides what runs, what requires approval, and what is denied, while an outbound-only runner verifies the action again on the host. New capabilities arrive as packs behind the same MCP integration, and every request is recorded in both a searchable audit trail and a tamper-evident host journal. [