
Envoy
The Receptionist
TractionGuest
SwipedOn
Teem
WhosOnLocation
VisitorTrack
Connect with Confidence

DogQ.io
Testpine
Cypress.io
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
TestSprite
Octomind.run
ACCELQ
Just get it tested. End-to-end web testing without code.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, DoesQA seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | proxyclick.com | does.qa |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Company | Startup from Belgium · 10 - 19 employees · 2004 | 2023 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Proxyclick is a cloud-based solution transforming how employees, visitors, and contractors flow in and out of locations around the world. With Proxyclick, organizations ensure people are welcomed safely and efficiently on-site while ensuring all work locations are secure and comply with data...
DoesQA is the most powerful web test automation tool: end-to-end testing for every web journey, from sign-up to checkout, with no code to write or maintain. Write steps in plain language or branch real user forks on a visual canvas. Built-in email and real MFA tokens reach the paths coded suites...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How to create custom flows with Proxyclick?
More videos
DoesQA - Just get it tested
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Proxyclick and DoesQA.
DoesQA's answer:
DoesQA simplifies test creation and improves reliability while keeping the tester in control. With unlimited concurrency as standard there's no faster way to create or run your tests.
DoesQA's answer:
DoesQA is the only solution which supports branching tests, API requests and Lighthouse Audits. DoesQA was built by experienced SDETs to make testing simpler, faster and more cost-effective while allowing all the power which comes with a traditional code-based solution.
DoesQA's answer:
Engineering teams who want powerful web end-to-end automation tests without the costs typically associated with building a test framework and running tests remotely.
DoesQA's answer:
Everyone's endlessly wasting money building their own test framework.
Share your experience with using Proxyclick and DoesQA. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Proxyclick since Mar 2021.
Hey, DoesQA here, we have a compatible set of steps as WebdriverIO but as a codeless test automation tool. Source: over 3 years ago
When comparing Proxyclick and DoesQA, you can also consider the following products.

Visitor registration that's changing how guests are greeted in companies around the world.
Compare Envoy to Proxyclick or DoesQA:

No-code tests in cloud for web developers with all skill levels
Compare DogQ.io to Proxyclick or DoesQA:

The Receptionost is a visitor managemnt solution that has visitor logging system to track visitor traffic.
Compare The Receptionist to Proxyclick or DoesQA:

No Code Test Automation for Web & Mobile and Test Management
Compare Testpine to Proxyclick or DoesQA:


Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
Compare Cypress.io to Proxyclick or DoesQA: