Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Propel ORM VS Entity Framework

Compare Propel ORM VS Entity Framework and see what are their differences

Propel ORM logo Propel ORM

Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, and Microframeworks (Backend)

Entity Framework logo Entity Framework

See Comparison of Entity Framework vs NHibernate.
  • Propel ORM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-27
  • Entity Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-18

Propel ORM features and specs

  • Active Record Pattern
    Propel ORM utilizes the active record pattern, which makes it straightforward to represent database tables as classes, simplifying CRUD operations.
  • Code Generation
    Propel provides a code generation tool that automatically generates PHP classes from your database schema, speeding up development and reducing boilerplate code.
  • Cross-Database Support
    Propel supports multiple database systems, making it a flexible choice for projects that might need to switch databases or support different environments.
  • Powerful Query Builder
    It includes a query builder that allows developers to construct complex SQL queries through a fluent API, improving code readability and maintainability.
  • Symfony Integration
    Propel integrates seamlessly with the Symfony framework, which can enhance the development experience for projects using Symfony.

Possible disadvantages of Propel ORM

  • Complex Configuration
    Propel's configuration can be complex and may require a significant learning curve, particularly for developers new to ORM or Propel itself.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction layer introduced by Propel can introduce some performance overhead compared to raw SQL, which might be a consideration for performance-critical applications.
  • Limited Flexibility
    While Propel is powerful, the active record pattern can make it less flexible when dealing with very complex queries or non-standard database configurations.
  • Community and Documentation
    Compared to some other ORMs, Propel has a smaller community and may lack extensive documentation or community support, potentially making troubleshooting more challenging.
  • Mature but Less Maintained
    Propel has been around for a while, which makes it mature, but it has fewer updates and active maintenance compared to some newer ORMs.

Entity Framework features and specs

  • Productivity
    Entity Framework automates database-related code generation, reducing the amount of boilerplate code developers must write and maintain. This allows developers to work more efficiently and focus more on business logic.
  • Abstraction
    It abstracts the database interaction details, enabling developers to work with higher-level .NET objects instead of raw SQL queries, resulting in clearer and more manageable code.
  • Code First Approach
    This allows developers to define their database schema using C# classes, making it easy to evolve the database alongside the codebase using migrations.
  • Support for Multiple Databases
    Entity Framework supports a wide range of relational databases, including SQL Server, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and MySQL, providing flexibility and choice to the developers.
  • Change Tracking
    It provides automatic change tracking of entity objects, simplifying the process of updating data in the database without manually tracking object changes.

Possible disadvantages of Entity Framework

  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction layer can lead to performance overhead compared to plain SQL queries, as the generated queries might not be as optimized as handcrafted SQL.
  • Complexity
    For simple or small applications, the complexity introduced by using an ORM like Entity Framework might be unnecessary and could complicate the architecture.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers need to learn the specific concepts and configurations of Entity Framework, which can be time-consuming compared to traditional database access methodologies.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    Debugging issues can be more challenging because of the abstraction, making it sometimes difficult to trace the exact query being executed and pinpoint performance bottlenecks.
  • Limited SQL Features
    While Entity Framework supports a wide range of SQL functionalities, there are advanced features specific to certain databases that may not be fully supported or could require custom implementation.

Propel ORM videos

No Propel ORM videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Entity Framework videos

Entity Framework Best Practices - Should EFCore Be Your Data Access of Choice?

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Entity Framework 6 Tutorial: Learn Entity Framework 6 from Scratch
  • Review - Getting the best out of Entity Framework Core - Jon P Smith

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Propel ORM and Entity Framework)
Web Frameworks
36 36%
64% 64
Development
37 37%
63% 63
Application And Data
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
21 21%
79% 79

User comments

Share your experience with using Propel ORM and Entity Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Entity Framework seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Propel ORM mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Propel ORM yet. Tracking of Propel ORM recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Entity Framework mentions (15)

  • Create a Simple .NET Workflow App From Scratch – Your Ultimate Guide
    For the simplicity we will use MSSQLProvider to fetch the data from the database. This class has basic functionality, if you want to create complex database queries, for example JOIN, you'd better use something like Entity Framework. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Entity Framework Core in .NET 7 7️⃣
    I only wanted to give a simple preview of what can be done with Entity Framework, but if this is something that interests you and you want to go further in-depth with all the possibilities, I recommend checking out the official docs where you can also find a great tutorial which will guide you through building your very own .NET Core web application. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Got an internship, need help with .NET
    Entity Framework documentation hub - Entity Framework is a modern object-relation mapper that lets you build a clean, portable, and high-level data access layer with .NET (C#) across a variety of databases, including SQL Database (on-premises and Azure), SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Azure Cosmos DB. It supports LINQ queries, change tracking, updates, and schema migrations. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to create a "Database Project" that can be used across multiple .NET apps?
    You can create the DAL using your existing code or start using a Object Relational Mapper like Entity Framework which will do a lot of the work for you, check this out here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/ also check out LINQ. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Website with Database. use C#
    And, possibly (not strictly speaking necessary but very useful) Entity framework as a backend part of it. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Propel ORM and Entity Framework, you can also consider the following products

Beego - Beego Web is official blog and documentation website for beego app web framework

Sequelize - Provides access to a MySQL database by mapping database entries to objects and vice-versa.

Mikro orm - TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns.

SQLAlchemy - SQLAlchemy is the Python SQL toolkit and Object Relational Mapper that gives application developers the full power and flexibility of SQL.

Hibernate - Hibernate an open source Java persistence framework project.

Dapper - Dapper is a user-friendly object mapper for the .NET framework.