Software Alternatives & Startups

ProjectCodeMeter VS Shellcheck

Compare ProjectCodeMeter VS Shellcheck and see what are their differences

ProjectCodeMeter

Measures Software Development Productivity, Estimates Costs, Source Code Metrics and Quality using Automatic Analysis

Rating
0 reviews
Shellcheck

ShellCheck finds bugs in your shell scripts

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Shellcheck seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 30 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 30
Code Analysis popularity
34% vs 66%
alternatives listed
35 vs 28

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

PCM
ProjectCodeMeter
S
Shellcheck
Website projectcodemeter.com shellcheck.net
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

PCM
ProjectCodeMeter 4 features
S
Shellcheck 6 features
  • Comprehensive Analysis
    ProjectCodeMeter provides detailed analysis of code by evaluating various metrics. This helps in understanding the complexity, maintainability, and potential issues within the codebase.
  • Time Estimation
    The tool offers time estimation for projects based on the code's complexity and the developer's profile, which aids in better project planning and resource allocation.
  • Productivity Measurement
    ProjectCodeMeter measures developer productivity by analyzing lines of code and other metrics. This can be useful for managers to assess team performance.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    The software supports multiple programming languages and platforms, making it versatile and usable in diverse development environments.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity of Use
    Some users may find the tool complex to set up and use due to the extensive data and metrics provided, especially if they are not familiar with code metric analysis.
  • Cost
    ProjectCodeMeter might be considered expensive for smaller teams or individual developers, as it is typically priced for enterprise use.
  • Potential Over-Reliance
    Teams may become overly reliant on the metrics provided, potentially overlooking qualitative aspects of code development that are not easily quantifiable.
  • Privacy Concerns
    The tool needs access to the codebase to perform its analysis, which might raise privacy and security concerns for some organizations or developers.
  • Static Code Analysis
    ShellCheck provides static analysis for shell scripts, allowing developers to catch errors and potential bugs without executing the script.
  • Comprehensive Error Detection
    It identifies a broad range of issues, including syntax errors, semantic errors, and best practice violations, helping to improve script reliability.
  • Suggestions for Improvements
    ShellCheck offers suggestions and fixes for many issues it detects, assisting developers in adhering to best practices.
  • Wide Compatibility
    ShellCheck supports various shell dialects, including Bash, Dash, and others, making it versatile for different environments.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, ShellCheck is freely available to everyone, with a community that contributes to its improvement and updates.
  • Integration with Editors
    ShellCheck integrates with various text editors and IDEs, enabling seamless error checking within the developer's workflow.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Users may need time to learn and understand ShellCheck's feedback, especially if they are not familiar with shell scripting best practices.
  • Potential Overhead
    While it provides valuable insights, using ShellCheck can add an overhead to the development process as scripts need to be checked and errors reviewed.
  • Not a Substitute for Testing
    ShellCheck should not be considered a substitute for thorough testing. Scripts still need to be executed to ensure functional correctness.
  • False Positives
    Like many static analyzers, ShellCheck may generate false positives, which can be misleading and require manual verification by the developer.
  • Resource Intensive for Large Scripts
    Analyzing very large or complex scripts might consume significant resources, potentially slowing down the workflow on older machines.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

PCM
ProjectCodeMeter 1 video + Add
S
Shellcheck 3 videos + Add

Outsourcing bill verification using ProjectCodeMeter

Linting Your Bash Scripts with Shellcheck

More videos

  • - How To Configure ShellCheck in Jenkins
  • - Write Safer Scripts Using Shellcheck

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
PCM
ProjectCodeMeter
S
Shellcheck
34% 34%
66% 66%
34% 34%
66% 66%
53% 53%
47% 47%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using ProjectCodeMeter and Shellcheck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

PCM
ProjectCodeMeter 0 mentions
S
Shellcheck 30 mentions

Tracking ProjectCodeMeter since Mar 2021.

  • Haskell: A Great Procedural Language
    The other ones most people point to are https://pandoc.org and https://shellcheck.net. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • I reduced the size of my Docker image by 40% – Dockerizing shell scripts
    > Are "Random shell scripts from the internet" categorically worse than "random docker images from the internet"? > With the shell script, you can literally read it in an ... ... https://shellcheck.net. Can't do that if all... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • TermiC: Terminal C, Interactive C/C++ REPL shell created with BASH
    Nice script. It's... uhhh... Not shellcheck-clean. https://shellcheck.net/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to ProjectCodeMeter and Shellcheck

When comparing ProjectCodeMeter and Shellcheck, you can also consider the following products.