Project Include VS Digraph.dev

• Comprehensive Guidance
  Project Include provides detailed frameworks and recommendations for implementing diversity and inclusion (D&I) in tech companies, making it easier for organizations to take actionable steps.
• Community Driven
  The initiative is community-based, drawing insights and experiences from a wide range of stakeholders, which enhances the relevance and applicability of the guidance provided.
• Focus on Systemic Change
  Project Include emphasizes systemic changes rather than one-off initiatives, aiming for long-term impact in creating inclusive work environments.
• Resource Availability
  The platform offers a wealth of resources, including research, personal stories, and practical tools for companies looking to improve D&I practices.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Scope of Industries
  While comprehensive for tech, the strategies may not be directly applicable to non-tech industries without adaptation.
• Implementation Challenges
  Companies may find it challenging to implement the recommended changes due to varying organizational cultures and resources.
• Voluntary Participation
  Adoption of Project Include’s recommendations is voluntary, which may limit broader systemic changes across industries.
• Resource Intensive
  Effective implementation of the recommendations can require significant time and resource investment from participating companies.

• Developer-focused positioning
  The .dev domain and branding suggest a tool built for developers and technical teams, so its workflows are likely to fit engineering needs better than a generic product. I could not browse the site, so this is inferred from its positioning rather than confirmed.
• Graph-based approach
  The name 'Digraph' (directed graph) suggests it models information as connected nodes and relationships. That kind of structure can make dependencies, ideas, or decisions easier to see than flat lists or documents. Confirm how the product actually uses this.
• Modern, minimal presentation
  Newer developer tools tend to have lean interfaces and a focused feature set, which can mean a short learning curve and less clutter. I could not verify this for Digraph, so check it with a trial.
• Potential for better organization and clarity
  If the tool works as the name suggests, visualizing relationships between items can improve shared understanding across a team. The benefit depends on how well the product is executed.
• Early-stage responsiveness
  Smaller or newer products often respond quickly to user feedback and let users influence the roadmap. This is a general tendency and has not been verified for Digraph.

Project Include wins the TechCrunch Include Award

No Digraph.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• FAANG is heavily Asian/Indian?

  Thanks to Project Include, most of the major companies issue annual diversity reports. Source: over 4 years ago

Tracking Digraph.dev since Oct 2026.