Project Include VS Concertmaster

• Comprehensive Guidance
  Project Include provides detailed frameworks and recommendations for implementing diversity and inclusion (D&I) in tech companies, making it easier for organizations to take actionable steps.
• Community Driven
  The initiative is community-based, drawing insights and experiences from a wide range of stakeholders, which enhances the relevance and applicability of the guidance provided.
• Focus on Systemic Change
  Project Include emphasizes systemic changes rather than one-off initiatives, aiming for long-term impact in creating inclusive work environments.
• Resource Availability
  The platform offers a wealth of resources, including research, personal stories, and practical tools for companies looking to improve D&I practices.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Scope of Industries
  While comprehensive for tech, the strategies may not be directly applicable to non-tech industries without adaptation.
• Implementation Challenges
  Companies may find it challenging to implement the recommended changes due to varying organizational cultures and resources.
• Voluntary Participation
  Adoption of Project Include’s recommendations is voluntary, which may limit broader systemic changes across industries.
• Resource Intensive
  Effective implementation of the recommendations can require significant time and resource investment from participating companies.

• User-Friendly Interface
  Concertmaster offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of varying technical expertise.
• Comprehensive Templates
  The platform provides a wide variety of templates that can be customized to fit the needs of different events, reducing the time needed for planning.
• Integration Capabilities
  Concertmaster integrates seamlessly with other tools and platforms, allowing for a more streamlined workflow and management of events.
• Strong Support Team
  The platform has a dedicated customer support team that is responsive and helpful, ensuring users can resolve issues promptly.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Free Features
  The free version of Concertmaster is somewhat limited in its capabilities, which may require users to upgrade to a paid plan for full functionality.
• Learning Curve for Advanced Features
  While the basic features are easy to use, some of the more advanced functionalities have a steeper learning curve, which may require additional time to master.
• Pricing Structure
  The pricing structure can be confusing for some users, especially when deciding between different tiered plans that offer varying levels of access and service.

Project Include wins the TechCrunch Include Award

Kavalan Concertmaster Port Cask Finish

More videos

• FAANG is heavily Asian/Indian?

  Thanks to Project Include, most of the major companies issue annual diversity reports. Source: over 4 years ago

• How can I organise my classical collection?

  I don't know if it would make things any better, but there's a free classical music "wrapper" for Spotify called Concertmaster: https://getconcertmaster.com/. Source: over 3 years ago

• Poor schemas, poor cataloguing: why music tagging sucks

  If you have Spotify premium give https://getconcertmaster.com/ a try. It's a frontend for Spotify with additional cataloging features for classical recordings. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

• Horrible edge cases to consider when dealing with music (Weird song, album and artist names)

  Concertmaster solved my issues with Spotify and classical, it's basically a Spotify wrapper for classical that makes it work a hell of a lot better. Source: over 4 years ago

View more