Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

ProcessMaker VS Cast.ai

Compare ProcessMaker VS Cast.ai and see what are their differences

Castmint
Type one line. Get a finished short. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

ProcessMaker logo ProcessMaker

ProcessMaker is a top-notch Low Code BPM platform used by dozens of businesses worldwide to design and deploy complex processes.

Cast.ai logo Cast.ai

CAST AI is an AI-driven platform designed to optimize cloud usage and reduce costs by over 60%. It is an all-in-one solution for Kubernetes monitoring, automation, optimization, and security.
  • ProcessMaker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-14
  • Cast.ai Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25

CAST AI is driven by a vision of decentralizing the cloud industry to free innovators from the limitations of cloud service providers. Our AI-powered cloud optimization engine delivers a cost-efficient, high-performing, and resilient infrastructure for every Kubernetes workload. Its unique blend of automation and optimization algorithms empowers innovators to build future-ready products and embrace the autonomous cloud. No more vendor lock-in or downtime, the cloud just got solved.

ProcessMaker

Website
processmaker.com
Pricing URL
Official ProcessMaker Pricing
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Cast.ai

Website
cast.ai
Pricing URL
Official Cast.ai Pricing
$ Details
freemium
Platforms
Browser Azure AWS Cloud Web
Release Date
2020 November
Edit details

ProcessMaker features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    ProcessMaker offers a drag-and-drop interface that simplifies the design of workflows and business processes for users with minimal coding expertise.
  • Rapid Deployment
    The low-code nature of ProcessMaker allows for faster implementation of business processes, enabling quicker transformation and adaptation to business needs.
  • Cost-Effective
    By allowing users to develop applications with minimal coding, ProcessMaker can reduce the need for extensive IT resources, leading to cost savings.
  • Integration Capabilities
    ProcessMaker supports integration with various third-party applications, which helps create seamless workflows across different systems.
  • Scalability
    ProcessMaker's cloud-based architecture supports scalability, allowing businesses to grow without major changes to their process management systems.
  • Extensive Integration Capabilities
    ProcessMaker supports integration with a wide array of third-party applications and services, including ERP systems, CRM systems, and web services. This allows for seamless data flow between different systems.
  • Agentic AI Workflows
    ProcessMaker supports Agentic AI, allowing users to create autonomous agents that can execute workflows, make decisions, and interact with systemsโ€”without human intervention.
  • Process Documentation
    Ensure your workflows are properly documented with little effort. AI documentation will create explanations for your entire process including all of its steps and assets. Or start with the documentation: explain your process first in your own words and generate functional workflow automations from scratch.
  • Robust Reporting and Analytics
    The platform offers extensive reporting and analytics capabilities. Users can generate various reports to track the performance of workflows and gain insights into operational bottlenecks, improving overall efficiency.

Possible disadvantages of ProcessMaker

  • Customization Limitations
    While ProcessMaker is powerful, there may be some advanced customization needs that require additional coding, which could be a limitation for complex processes.
  • Learning Curve
    For users who are not familiar with BPM or low-code platforms, there can be an initial learning curve that may require training.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, particularly when dealing with very large workflows or significant data loads.
  • Dependency on Vendor
    Reliance on ProcessMaker for ongoing updates and support could be a concern if the vendor's priorities change or if they discontinue support.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Since ProcessMaker is cloud-based, its functionality is limited when offline, which might be a drawback for some mobile or remote scenarios.
  • Cost of Premium Features
    While the open-source version is free, many advanced features and capabilities are only available in the paid enterprise version. Organizations may incur significant costs if they require these premium features.
  • Scalability Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues and scalability limitations when handling very large or complex workflows. This can be a concern for large enterprises with extensive process automation needs.
  • Limited Customization in UI
    Although ProcessMaker is highly customizable in terms of workflow logic, the customization options for the user interface are somewhat limited compared to other BPM tools. This can be limiting for organizations wanting a highly tailored user experience.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Plugins
    The tool often relies on third-party plugins to extend its functionality. While this makes it versatile, it also introduces potential dependency issues and can complicate the upgrade and maintenance processes.

Cast.ai features and specs

  • Monitoring
  • Analytics and Reporting
  • Analytics dashboards
  • Managed Services
  • Cloud Technology

ProcessMaker videos

+ Add

ProcessMaker's Transfer Credit Evaluation

More videos:

  • Demo - Process Intelligence Explainer
  • Demo - ProcessMaker Platform Explainer

Cast.ai videos

+ Add

Ep 160 Cast.ai and Kubernetes Challenges with Leon Kuperman, CTO and Co-Founder of Cast.AI

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ProcessMaker and Cast.ai)

ProcessMaker

Cast.ai

Project Management
100 100%
Project Management
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
Cloud Computing
100% 100
Business & Commerce
100 100%
Business & Commerce
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ProcessMaker and Cast.ai. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ProcessMaker and Cast.ai

ProcessMaker Reviews

7 Best Business Process Management Tools (2023)
ProcessMaker is a flexible and intuitive software suite that allows you to create, manage, and deploy complex workflows using visual design, and an integrated UI for management, simulation, and testing.
Source: theecmconsultant.com
Top 7 Workflow Software (2020 Reviews)
ProcessMaker is an open-source workflow automation software thatโ€™s best suited for large companies. Its low-code business process management platform lets users design and automate workflows quickly.
Source: clickup.com
10 Best Open Source BPM Tools
ProcessMaker is a software that allows you to model your business processes. You access a graphical interface on which you can drag the different constituent elements of your workflows.
Source: wisdomplexus.com
20 Free Open Source BPM Software for Businesses in 2021
ProcessMaker Workflow BPM is one of the top open-source BPM software solutions that helps in creating a navigable framework of business processes. It is cloud-based and can be accessed from all popular devices and browsers. The best think is that it can be used by businesses of all the sizes and requirements
Source: www.techjockey.com
Top 15 Workflow Management Software Solutions
ProcessMaker is an easy to use and cost effective open source business process management (BPM) and workflow software tool. It is lightweight, very efficient, and has a low overhead. Numerous business analysts and subject matter experts use ProcessMaker as their workflow software solution because it enables them to communicate with their technical teams effectively and...
Source: financesonline.com

Cast.ai Reviews

The Best Cloud Cost Management Tool: An Expert Guide (2026)
Cast AI and ScaleOps are hyper-focused on automating Kubernetes efficiency. Cast AI is aggressive, aiming to replace or augment native autoscalers with real-time Spot instance management to achieve average savings of 50-65% (Source: verified competitor profile โ€” Cast AI public documentation and published case studies (2026)). ScaleOps takes a different approach, dynamically...
Source: nuvelia.fr
Thalaxo vs Cast AI: Multi-Cloud FinOps Compared (2026)
Cast AI, conversely, operates with surgical precision inside the Kubernetes ecosystem. It is designed to be a replacement for, or a supercharger of, the native Kubernetes scheduler and cluster autoscaler. Its engine continuously analyzes pod requests and the real-time Spot market to make millisecond decisions, bin-packing pods onto the most cost-effective nodes possible....
Source: nuvelia.fr

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cast.ai seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ProcessMaker mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ProcessMaker yet. Tracking of ProcessMaker recommendations started around Jul 2021.

Cast.ai mentions (24)

  • What is the role of QoS for Pods?
    There are tools CastAI (https://cast.ai/) and KubeCost (https://www.kubecost.com/) which helps you get these values. I haven't tried it personally, but they are promising. There are other tools as well. One of the approach OP suggested, monitor the values over a period of time to determine the right requests value, is really good one. I would modify it a bit. Generally take the p95 value for requests and 1.5-2x... Source: about 3 years ago
  • Kubernetes Cost Monitoring
    Not sire if this helps but someone just showed me this free tool that looks at cost for Kube https://cast.ai/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Is k8s Kops preferable than eks?
    Curious about what about cast.ai sets it apart for you? I went with spot because it is owned by a big company and knew it wasn't going to disappear. I think cast was still in invite only mode, as well. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Scheduled spindown/up of clusters?
    I found that cast.ai seems to have this functionality but am wondering if there is a free option. Also pursuing gMaestro but they're not available on arm64 yet. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Reducing AWS costs?
    If you're using Kubernetes, CAST AI is the fastest way to significantly reduce your compute bill and keep it there. It manages compute capacity automatically and has dedicated support to get you started even faster. The best part - Kubernetes cost monitoring and security insights are free. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ProcessMaker and Cast.ai, you can also consider the following products

Kissflow - Kissflow is a workflow tool & business process workflow management software to automate your workflow process. Rated #1 cloud workflow software in Google Apps Marketplace.

OpenShift - OpenShift gives you all the tools you need to develop, host and scale your apps in the public or private cloud. Get started today.

ProntoForms - ProntoForms is a mobile business solutions application, converting paper forms onto any tablet or mobile device.

CloudZero - The worldโ€™s leading cloud cost optimization platform. Allocate 100% of your cloud spend to identify savings opportunities.

Now Platform - Get native platform intelligence, so you can predict, prioritize, and proactively manage the work that matters most with the NOW Platform from ServiceNow.

CloudStack - Apache's CloudStack is a Project backed by Citrix and designed to be a direct competitor to...

Loading...