RPC over an inter-communication messaging queue for service-oriented Node & TypeScript back-ends. Self-describing services generate their own clients — no boilerplate, no service discovery, no load balancer.
Cloud printing without VPN or drivers: print from anywhere to any printer through a printer URL, and get documents signed electronically on the way.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Printix
seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned
5 times
since March 2021.
social mentions
5 vs 0
Cloud Printing popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
65 vs 2
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Cloud-Based Management Printix offers cloud-based print management, which allows for remote management and monitoring of print services from any location.
Scalability The platform is highly scalable, making it suitable for small businesses to large enterprises without the need for additional hardware.
Security Printix provides secure printing features, including data encryption and user authentication, which helps protect sensitive information.
Ease of Use The platform is designed for usability, with an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup and management of print services.
Cost-Effective By eliminating the need for on-premise print servers, Printix can reduce the costs associated with hardware and maintenance.
Possible disadvantages
Internet Dependency As a cloud-based solution, Printix requires a reliable internet connection, which could be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
Learning Curve While user-friendly, there may still be a learning curve for IT staff who are accustomed to traditional print management systems.
Subscription Costs The platform operates on a subscription basis, which may be a recurring expense that some businesses need to budget for.
Limited Offline Functionality Printix may have limited functionality when offline, which could be an issue during network outages or for users in remote locations.
Third-Party Integration Some users may find limitations when integrating Printix with other third-party systems or software, potentially requiring additional configuration.
TypeScript-first design imqueue is built with TypeScript at its core, providing strong typing, better IDE support, and compile-time error checking, which helps catch bugs early and improves the developer experience when building microservices.
RPC-style messaging abstraction It simplifies inter-service communication by abstracting away the complexities of message queue protocols, allowing developers to make calls that feel like local function calls while the underlying complexity of message passing is handled by the framework.
Built on RabbitMQ By leveraging RabbitMQ as its message broker, imqueue benefits from a mature, battle-tested messaging system with reliable delivery guarantees, clustering support, and a large ecosystem of tools and documentation.
Code generation and tooling imqueue provides CLI tools and code generation capabilities that can automatically create service clients and boilerplate code, reducing repetitive work and helping maintain consistency across microservices.
Microservices-focused architecture The framework is specifically designed for building distributed microservices systems, offering features like service discovery and structured communication patterns that address common challenges in distributed system design.
Possible disadvantages
Smaller community and ecosystem Compared to more mainstream microservices frameworks, imqueue has a relatively small user base and community, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, Stack Overflow answers, and community-contributed plugins or extensions.
Limited documentation depth While basic documentation exists, some users report that advanced use cases, edge cases, and troubleshooting guides are not as thoroughly documented as more established frameworks, requiring more trial-and-error or direct code inspection.
RabbitMQ dependency lock-in Being tightly coupled to RabbitMQ means teams must adopt and manage this specific message broker, which could be a limitation for organizations that prefer or already use alternative messaging systems like Kafka, NATS, or AWS SQS.
Learning curve for framework-specific patterns Developers need to learn imqueue's specific conventions, decorators, and architectural patterns, which adds an additional learning curve on top of understanding TypeScript and general microservices concepts.
Potential scalability concerns for very large systems As with many queue-based RPC frameworks, extremely high-throughput or very large-scale distributed systems may encounter performance bottlenecks or require significant additional configuration and tuning of the underlying RabbitMQ infrastructure.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
Printix@imqueue
Overall verdict
Printix is generally considered a good cloud-based print management solution.
Why this product is good
Printix offers a robust set of features that cater to various print management needs, including easy deployment and management of printers and printing processes, integration with existing IT infrastructures, and enhanced security through secure print release and authentication methods. It is praised for its ease of use, scalability, and flexibility, making it suitable for different organizational sizes and needs.
Recommended for
Organizations looking for a cloud-based print management solution.
IT departments needing a scalable and secure print solution.
Businesses seeking to streamline their printing processes and reduce costs.
Educational institutions that require centralized print management.
Share your experience with using Printix and @imqueue.
For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Social recommendations and mentions
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
Printix5 mentions@imqueue0 mentions
Printing from Mac OS - Best practices
We use Printix for mixed Winodws/MacOS or cloud based environments. It is a cheap and simple yet flexible way to manage printers.
Source:
almost 4 years ago
Azure AD vs On Prem AD
What about something like https://printix.net/? Haven’t used it but looking.
Source:
almost 4 years ago
Pull Print (Secure Print)
Https://printix.net/ makes this an absolute breeze to setup. Works with any printer (not just the big MFPs).
Source:
over 4 years ago
With Anypoint MQ, perform advanced asynchronous messaging scenarios — such as queueing and pub/sub — with hosted and managed cloud message queues and exchanges.