
qimgv
sxiv
nomacs
Eye of Gnome (eog)
feh
OsiriX MD
XnView MP
Powerful image viewer with minimal UI. Contribute to phillipberndt/pqiv development by creating an account on GitHub.

Managed Hosting for developers, entrepreneurs, and businesses like yours

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, pqiv seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | opalstack.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of pqiv yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using pqiv and Opalstack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I switched from imv to qpiv and have been very pleased with it. Source: over 3 years ago
Personally I use pqiv. Not only is gallery mode built-in, but it's extremely configurable so can make it do almost anything you need. Source: over 4 years ago
Tracking Opalstack since Sep 2023.
When comparing pqiv and Opalstack, you can also consider the following products.

Simple image viewer written in qt. Supports webm playback.
Compare qimgv to pqiv or Opalstack:

Simple X Image Viewer. Contribute to muennich/sxiv development by creating an account on GitHub.
Compare sxiv to pqiv or Opalstack:

nomacs is a free, open source image viewer, which supports mu
Compare nomacs to pqiv or Opalstack:
Simple image viewer for the GNOME desktop.
Compare Eye of Gnome (eog) to pqiv or Opalstack:

