Software Alternatives & Startups

Postgres-XC VS MySQL

Compare Postgres-XC VS MySQL and see what are their differences

Postgres-XC

Free, secure and fast downloads from the largest Open Source applications and software directory - SourceForge.net

Rating
0 reviews
MySQL

The world's most popular open source database

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, MySQL seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 4
Databases popularity
2% vs 98%
alternatives listed
17 vs 226

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Postgres-XC
MySQL
Website sourceforge.net mysql.com
Pricing —
Open source
Company — Startup from the United States
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Postgres-XC 0 features
MySQL 9 features

No features have been listed yet.

  • Reliability
    MySQL is known for its reliability and durability, making it a solid choice for many businesses' database management needs.
  • Performance
    It offers robust performance, handling large databases and complex queries efficiently.
  • Open Source
    MySQL is an open-source database, making it freely available under the GNU General Public License (GPL).
  • Scalability
    MySQL supports large-scale applications and can handle high volumes of transactions.
  • Community Support
    There is a large, active MySQL community that offers extensive resources, documentation, and support.
  • Cross-Platform
    MySQL is compatible with various operating systems like Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Integrations
    MySQL integrates well with numerous development frameworks, including LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP/Python/Perl).
  • Security
    MySQL offers various security features, such as user account management, password policies, and encrypted connections.
  • Cost
    The open-source nature of MySQL means that it can be very cost-effective, especially for small to medium-sized businesses.

Possible disadvantages

  • Support
    While community support is plentiful, official support from Oracle can be quite expensive.
  • Complexity
    More advanced features and configurations can be complex and may require a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Scalability Limitations
    While MySQL is scalable, very high-scale applications may run into limitations compared to some newer database technologies.
  • Plug-in Storage Engines
    The use of plug-in storage engines like InnoDB or MyISAM can cause inconsistencies and complicate backups and recovery processes.
  • ACID Compliance
    Although MySQL supports ACID compliance, certain configurations or storage engines may not fully adhere to ACID properties, affecting transaction reliability.
  • Concurrent Writes
    Handling a high number of concurrent writes can be less efficient compared to some other database systems designed specifically for high concurrency.
  • Feature Set
    Some advanced features found in other SQL databases (e.g., full-text indexing, rich analytics) may be less robust or absent.
  • Vendor Dependency
    With Oracle now owning MySQL, there can be concerns about licensing changes or other forms of vendor lock-in.
  • Replication Complexities
    Setting up replication and ensuring data consistency across distributed systems can be complex and error-prone.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Postgres-XC
MySQL

Overall verdict

  • Postgres-XC is a discontinued open-source project that provided write-scalable, multi-master synchronous PostgreSQL clustering, but it has been superseded by newer forks and is no longer actively maintained, making it a poor choice for new deployments today.

Why this product is good

  • Was one of the earliest solutions to add horizontal write scalability to PostgreSQL through a distributed architecture
  • Offered multi-master synchronous replication allowing reads and writes from any node
  • Maintained strong consistency (ACID compliance) across the cluster, unlike many NoSQL alternatives
  • Inspired successor projects like Postgres-XL and later influenced Citus and other distributed Postgres solutions
  • Free and open-source, allowing full inspection and modification of the codebase

Recommended for

  • Users researching the historical evolution of distributed PostgreSQL architectures
  • Legacy systems still running Postgres-XC that need maintenance knowledge
  • Developers evaluating old codebases before migrating to actively maintained alternatives like Postgres-XL, Citus, or YugabyteDB
  • Not recommended for new production deployments due to lack of updates, security patches, and community support

Overall verdict

  • Yes, MySQL is generally considered to be a good choice for many applications, especially those requiring a relational database management system. Its performance, ease of integration, and support for various storage engines make it a versatile option.

Why this product is good

  • MySQL is a popular open-source relational database management system known for its reliability, ease of use, and strong community support. It has a proven track record and is widely used for web applications, data warehousing, and logging applications. Additionally, MySQL offers robust security features, scalability, and cross-platform support.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized web applications
  • LAMP stack environments
  • E-commerce platforms
  • Logging and data warehousing applications
  • Projects requiring a mature, well-supported RDBMS

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Postgres-XC 0 videos + Add
MySQL 2 videos + Add

No Postgres-XC videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

MySQL IN 10 MINUTES (2020) | Introduction to Databases, SQL, & MySQL

More videos

  • - A Review of MySQL Open Source Software

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Postgres-XC
MySQL
2% 2%
98% 98%
5% 5%
95% 95%
2% 2%
98% 98%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Postgres-XC and MySQL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Postgres-XC no reviews yet
MySQL no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Postgres-XC yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Postgres-XC 0 mentions
MySQL 4 mentions

Tracking Postgres-XC since Mar 2021.

  • I have a recurring issue with a MySQL DB where I continually run out of disk space due to logs being filled. I've tried everything I can think of. Can anyone think of anything else I should try?
    So, I did a quick read through the mysql reference and found a bunch of flush related commands. I tried:. Source: over 3 years ago
  • MMORPG design resources
    MySQL: Any SQL or DB knock-off, really... mysql.com - mariadb.org - sqlite.org. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Probably a syntax error
    15 years and five strokes ago. I was a Unix sysadmin. ALthough I was never an actual programmer, I did maintenance/light enhancement for the organization's website, in php. Now, as self-administered cognative therapy, I'm going back to... Source: about 5 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Postgres-XC and MySQL

When comparing Postgres-XC and MySQL, you can also consider the following products.