
Port Manager
Portero
Portrackr
LocalCan™
OpenAI Codex CLI
Fing
Port Checker
Reveal why a port is in use

Automated software dependency project health tracking

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Deadpendency seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | porttracex.com | deadpendency.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using PortTraceX and Deadpendency. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking PortTraceX since Nov 2025.
I created a tiny startup in Haskell which failed RIP. I decided to open source the code though. Source: over 3 years ago
I sometimes stream my Haskell work on deadpendency - https://www.twitch.tv/alistairbuzz. Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing PortTraceX and Deadpendency, you can also consider the following products.

Find, open and kill ports in a couple of clicks. Works with Node, Python, Ruby, PHP, HTTP and pretty much any process listening on a TCP port.
Compare Port Manager to PortTraceX or Deadpendency:

Know exactly what's running on every port of your Mac
Compare Portero to PortTraceX or Deadpendency:


Develop your apps locally with .local domains and HTTPS
Compare LocalCan™ to PortTraceX or Deadpendency:

Frontier reasoning in the terminal
Compare OpenAI Codex CLI to PortTraceX or Deadpendency:

Discover which devices are connected to any Wi-Fi network, map devices, detect intruders, assess...
Compare Fing to PortTraceX or Deadpendency: