Poll Everywhere VS Intelligence Squared

• Real-time Engagement
  Poll Everywhere allows for instant feedback and interaction, making it easier to engage the audience in a live setting.
• Ease of Use
  The platform offers a user-friendly interface, making it simple to create and manage polls even for those who are not tech-savvy.
• Versatile Question Types
  Poll Everywhere supports multiple question formats, including multiple choice, open-ended, word cloud, and ranking, providing flexibility in how you gather responses.
• Integration Options
  The tool integrates with popular presentation software like PowerPoint, Google Slides, and Keynote, allowing seamless inclusion in presentations.
• Mobile Accessibility
  Participants can respond via their mobile devices, ensuring accessibility and higher participation rates.
• Data Analysis and Reporting
  Poll Everywhere provides options for exporting data and generating reports, aiding in post-event analysis.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Free Plan
  The free version has constraints on the number of participants and features, making it less suitable for larger events or advanced needs.
• Learning Curve
  While the interface is generally user-friendly, some advanced features require time to learn and master.
• Internet Dependent
  Both the presenter and the participants need to have a stable internet connection, which might be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
• Cost
  Premium features and higher participant limits require a subscription, which could be costly for smaller organizations or individuals.
• Customization Limitations
  Some users might find the customization options for themes and templates somewhat limited compared to other competitor tools.

• High-quality debates
  Intelligence Squared US hosts Oxford-style debates featuring leading experts, authors, and public intellectuals on important and timely topics, providing audiences with well-structured, substantive discussions that go beyond typical media discourse.
• Balanced presentation of viewpoints
  The format requires two teams to argue for and against a motion, ensuring that audiences hear strong arguments from both sides of an issue rather than a one-sided perspective, promoting critical thinking and intellectual humility.
• Audience engagement and voting
  The live audience votes before and after each debate, and the winner is determined by which side moves the most votes. This interactive element engages viewers and provides a fascinating real-time measure of persuasion effectiveness.
• Free and accessible content
  Intelligence Squared makes its debates widely available through its website, podcasts, YouTube, and public radio, ensuring that high-quality intellectual discourse is accessible to a broad audience at no cost.
• Promotes civil discourse
  In an era of increasing polarization and hostile political rhetoric, Intelligence Squared models respectful, evidence-based argumentation and demonstrates that people with opposing views can engage each other constructively and courteously.

Possible disadvantages

• Binary framing of complex issues
  The for-or-against motion format can oversimplify nuanced topics by forcing them into a binary framework, potentially leaving out important middle-ground positions or alternative perspectives that don't fit neatly into either side.
• Limited diversity of debaters
  The debates tend to feature a recurring pool of prominent intellectuals, authors, and policy experts who often come from elite academic or media backgrounds, which can limit the range of lived experiences and perspectives represented on stage.
• Debate as performance over truth-seeking
  The competitive format incentivizes rhetorical skill and persuasion tactics over genuine truth-seeking. A more charismatic or skilled debater may win the audience over even with weaker arguments, potentially misleading viewers.
• Voting mechanism is imperfect
  The audience voting system, while engaging, can be skewed by the composition of the live audience, which may not be representative of the general public. Additionally, measuring who 'moved the most votes' doesn't necessarily reflect who made the best argument.
• Infrequent coverage of certain topics
  While the debates cover a wide range of issues, certain important but less headline-grabbing topics may be underrepresented in favor of more provocative or trending subjects that are more likely to attract large audiences and media attention.

Mastering Poll Everywhere at your next live event or presentation

More videos

FAPA Intelligence Squared US Review

More videos

• Live Polling: Free guide + Top 7 Live Poll Tools
  www.questionpro.com · Apr 2022

  Popular as a polling solution, Poll Everywhere helps you add live audience interactions to slides, so that the speaker could deliver effective presentations. Being a web-based audience response system, the poll helps...

• 10 Best Poll Everywhere Alternatives (with Free Trials + Pricing)
  surveysparrow.com · Jan 2022

  Poll Everywhere is a great presenter tool. But its interface feels clunky, and it’s tough to customize if you want to target specific participant groups. If these are the features you’re missing, SurveySparrow is one...

• Best Poll Apps to Look for in 2021 | Create a Poll in Seconds!
  surveysparrow.com · May 2020

  Make your presentations more engaging. Create a poll on the platform and add the Poll Everywhere widget to your presentation be it PowerPoint, Keynote or Google Slides.

We have no reviews of Intelligence Squared yet. Be the first one to post