Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Podseeker VS Digraph.dev

Compare Podseeker VS Digraph.dev and see what are their differences

Podseeker

Find, pitch, and book the right podcasts for your clients. Podcast outreach software for PR teams and booking agencies.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly (3 seats, 200 recs, 400 pitches)
Alternatives Is it good?
Digraph.dev

AI marketing platform for brands.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $99 / Monthly
Alternatives Is it good?
HIVLY.APP
Give Hivly an idea. Get a finished social post. Add a photo and one sentence. Hivly writes the caption, designs the post, and schedules it for Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Marketing popularity
70% vs 30%
alternatives listed
18 vs 1

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Podseeker
Digraph.dev
Website podseeker.co digraph.dev
Pricing
Paid Free trial $99 / Monthly (3 seats, 200 recs, 400 pitches) Official pricing
Freemium Free trial $99 / Monthly Official pricing
Platforms
Web REST API
—
Company Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2021 Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees
Listed in
Public Relations Marketing PR Podcasting Email Outreach +2
SaaS Market Research Marketing Platform Marketing +1

About Podseeker and Digraph.dev

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Podseeker
Digraph.dev

Podseeker helps PR teams, podcast booking agencies, and experts get booked on the right podcasts. Recommendations by client fit. Start with a client profile and Podseeker recommends podcasts that fit, each with a Client Fit score and a short reason. A database built for outreach. Search by 200+...

Read more about Podseeker

Digraph is an AI marketing platform for brands. It brings together AI research, market intelligence, website and campaign analysis, specialist AI workflows, and marketer-led guidance to help teams understand what shapes buyer decisions and what to do next. Teams can measure how AI systems...

Read more about Digraph.dev

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Podseeker 6 features
Digraph.dev 5 features
  • Podcast recommendations
    Add a client profile and get podcasts matched by Client Fit, each with a fit score and a short reason.
  • Booking intelligence
    See how selective each show is, who it books, and its recent episodes before you pitch.
  • Outreach-focused search
    Search by 200+ outreach topics with filters for booking difficulty, guest-friendly shows, activity, listener estimates, and location.
  • Host and producer contacts
    Find host and producer contacts for the shows you want to pitch.
  • Personalized pitching
    Draft pitches from your own template, AI-assisted or plain mail merge, and send from your own Gmail or Outlook.
  • Smart follow-ups and teams
    Follow-ups stop when a host replies or an email bounces. Share clients, lists, and conversations across your team.
  • Developer-focused positioning
    The .dev domain and branding suggest a tool built for developers and technical teams, so its workflows are likely to fit engineering needs better than a generic product. I could not browse the site, so this is inferred from its positioning rather than confirmed.
  • Graph-based approach
    The name 'Digraph' (directed graph) suggests it models information as connected nodes and relationships. That kind of structure can make dependencies, ideas, or decisions easier to see than flat lists or documents. Confirm how the product actually uses this.
  • Modern, minimal presentation
    Newer developer tools tend to have lean interfaces and a focused feature set, which can mean a short learning curve and less clutter. I could not verify this for Digraph, so check it with a trial.
  • Potential for better organization and clarity
    If the tool works as the name suggests, visualizing relationships between items can improve shared understanding across a team. The benefit depends on how well the product is executed.
  • Early-stage responsiveness
    Smaller or newer products often respond quickly to user feedback and let users influence the roadmap. This is a general tendency and has not been verified for Digraph.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Podseeker
Digraph.dev
70% 70%
Marketing
30% 30%
0% 0%
Market Research
100% 100%
100% 100%
PR
0% 0%
100% 100%
Podcasts
0% 0%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Podseeker and Digraph.dev.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Podseeker's answer

Gmail and Microsoft Graph APIs for sending from your own mailbox, hosted on AWS.

What makes your product unique?

Podseeker's answer

Podseeker is built around fit, not database size. It recommends podcasts for each client by Client Fit, with a fit score and a short reason, and shows booking intelligence on every show: how selective it is, who it books, and recent episodes. Pitches go out from your own Gmail or Outlook, never automatically, and follow-ups stop when a host replies.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Podseeker's answer

Most podcast tools are either a large database to browse or an automated sender. Podseeker connects the two around one question: which shows would want this guest? You get client-matched recommendations, host and producer contacts, personalized pitching in your own words, and reply-aware follow-ups in one place, for one plan at $99/month with 3 seats. Pitches to very high-fit podcasts booked at 6.2%, compared with 3.3% overall.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Podseeker's answer

PR agencies, podcast booking agencies, and in-house PR teams who book clients or executives on podcasts every month. Authors, coaches, and consultants who pitch themselves use it too, and developers and AI agents use the Podcast Data API.

What's the story behind your product?

Podseeker's answer

Podseeker started from a simple frustration in podcast PR: most of the time goes into finding the right shows and the right contact, and most pitches go to shows that were never a fit. We built Podseeker to fix the targeting first, then make pitching and follow-up from your own inbox simple. It's independent and bootstrapped, and we build it closely with the PR teams who use it every week.

User comments

Share your experience with using Podseeker and Digraph.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to Podseeker and Digraph.dev

When comparing Podseeker and Digraph.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...