Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Plot Digitizer VS CMake

Compare Plot Digitizer VS CMake and see what are their differences

Electe
Illuminate the future with AI featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Plot Digitizer logo Plot Digitizer

All-in-One Tool to Extract Data from Graphs, Plots & Images

CMake logo CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.
  • Plot Digitizer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17
  • CMake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-21

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

Plot Digitizer features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    Plot Digitizer offers a simple and intuitive interface, making it accessible for users of varying technical skill levels.
  • Supports Multiple File Formats
    The tool supports a variety of file formats, including PNG, JPEG, and PDF, offering flexibility in terms of input data.
  • Precision and Accuracy
    Plot Digitizer provides precise and accurate data extraction, ensuring reliable outputs from digitized plots.
  • Versatile Application
    It can be used for various types of graphs and charts, such as line graphs, scatter plots, and bar charts.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The application is web-based, which allows it to be used across different operating systems without needing additional software installations.

Possible disadvantages of Plot Digitizer

  • Limited Free Features
    The free version may have limited features compared to the paid version, which could restrict functionality for some users.
  • Internet Dependency
    As a web-based tool, Plot Digitizer requires a stable internet connection for use, which might be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is generally user-friendly, new users may still require time to understand all available features to use the tool efficiently.
  • Potential for Manual Errors
    Manual calibration and adjustments might introduce errors, especially when dealing with complex or high-density plots.
  • Performance Limitations
    Very large or complex datasets might impact the performance and speed of the tool, potentially leading to longer processing times.

CMake features and specs

  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages of CMake

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

Analysis of CMake

Overall verdict

  • CMake is generally considered a good tool for managing the build process of software projects, especially those with a complex codebase that spans multiple platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    It offers great flexibility in terms of defining build processes, enabling advanced configuration and optimization techniques to be used.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many popular IDEs and other tools, providing a smoother development experience.
  • Wide adoption
    CMake is widely used in the industry, which leads to robust community support and regular updates.
  • Cross platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple platforms, which makes it highly valuable for projects that need to be compiled and run on different operating systems.

Recommended for

  • projects requiring cross-platform compatibility
  • developers looking for a powerful build configuration tool
  • complex software projects with numerous dependencies
  • teams that value strong community and industry support

Plot Digitizer videos

+ Add

Plot digitizer

CMake videos

+ Add

CMake for Dummies

More videos:

  • Review - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert โ€œUsing Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Designโ€
  • Review - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Plot Digitizer and CMake)

Plot Digitizer

CMake

Data Extraction
100 100%
Data Extraction
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
Data Visualization
100 100%
Data Visualization
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Plot Digitizer and CMake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CMake seems to be a lot more popular than Plot Digitizer. While we know about 55 links to CMake, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Plot Digitizer. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Plot Digitizer mentions (3)

  • [OC] Autism rates are driven by changes in policy and diagnostic criteria, not vaccinations
    Data: The CDC data estimating national autism rates only shows data every other year since 2000 (https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html). I used California data from Nevison (2018) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223814/ ) to show a longer-term historical trend. While it doesnโ€™t completely match the national data during the overlapping years (and I wouldnโ€™t expect it to), I have no reason to... Source: about 3 years ago
  • graph website/app?
    There are several, yes. Here is one, and here is anther, and here is a third. There is a detailed comparison here. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Show HN: Data Painter โ€“ A Different Way to Interact with Your Data
    I found this... Something like what you have in mind? (not Foss) https://plotdigitizer.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

CMake mentions (55)

  • How I deployed my first project for my devops portfolio: Project Architecture
    I used CMAKE as my compiling tool followed by make. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • DeadLock: Research Results & Tech Stack
    All this C++ project can't be ran as simple C++ code, so I will be building this whole package using CMake. It will streamline building this project onto other computers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Creating a Native Desktop GUI Using C++ with GTK
    I used CMAKE to define the build configurations. I find it very convenient that CMAKE generates the Makefile on Linux and can also create a Visual Studio project on Windows. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Top 7 C++ Tools to explore in 2024 if it's not already the case.
    CMake stands for "Cross-platform Make" and is an open-source, platform-independent build system. It's designed to build, test, and package software projects written in C and C++, but it can also be used for other languages. Here's an overview of CMake and its features:. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Plot Digitizer and CMake, you can also consider the following products

WebPlotDigitizer - WebPlotDigitizer - Web based tool to extract numerical data from plots, images and maps.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

DigitizeIt - Sometimes it is necessary to extract data values from graphs, e.g.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction toolโ€”that is, a next-generation build tool.

GraphClick - GraphClick is a graph digitizer shareware for Mac OS X which allows to automatically retrieve the original (x,y)-data from the image of a scanned graphor fom QuickTime movies.

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

Loading...