Software Alternatives & Startups

Platform.sh VS CloudLinux

Compare Platform.sh VS CloudLinux and see what are their differences

Platform.sh

Continuous deployment cloud hosting

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
CloudLinux

Making Linux secure, stable, and profitable for thousands of hosting providers and data centers worldwide.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Platform.sh seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 36 times since March 2021.

social mentions
36 vs 0
Cloud Hosting popularity
96% vs 4%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Platform.sh
CloudLinux
Website platform.sh cloudlinux.com
Pricing
Open source Official pricing
Open source
Company Startup from France · 100 - 249 employees · 2010 —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Platform.sh 7 features
CloudLinux 5 features
  • Ease of Use
    Platform.sh provides a user-friendly interface and integrates seamlessly with a wide range of development tools, making it easy for developers to deploy, manage, and scale their applications.
  • Multi-Cloud Support
    Platform.sh supports multiple cloud providers, allowing users to choose the best infrastructure for their needs and ensure redundancy and high availability.
  • Automated Workflows
    The platform automates many of the tedious aspects of development and deployment, such as environment creation, updates, and scaling, which can save developers a significant amount of time and reduce errors.
  • Git-based Deployment
    Platform.sh uses Git for version control, making it easy to manage code changes, roll back to previous versions, and collaborate with other developers.
  • Security Features
    Platform.sh offers robust security features, including end-to-end encryption, compliance with various industry standards, and granular access controls to help protect applications and data.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to easily scale applications both vertically and horizontally to handle increases in traffic and usage, ensuring optimal performance.
  • Customizable Environments
    Developers can create multiple isolated environments for different stages of development (e.g., development, testing, staging), which allows for more controlled and efficient workflows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Platform.sh can be more expensive compared to other hosting solutions, particularly for small projects or startups with limited budgets.
  • Complexity for Simple Projects
    For very simple or small-scale projects, the robust features of Platform.sh might be overkill, adding unnecessary complexity to the project.
  • Learning Curve
    While Platform.sh is designed to be developer-friendly, there can be a learning curve for teams unfamiliar with the platform or with advanced features.
  • Limited Language Support
    Although Platform.sh supports a wide range of programming languages, some less common languages might not be supported, which could be a limitation for certain projects.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying heavily on Platform.sh's unique features can create a situation where migrating to another platform could become complex and time-consuming, leading to vendor lock-in.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    Since Platform.sh is a cloud-based service, consistent internet connectivity is required to access and manage applications, which can be a drawback in environments with unreliable internet service.
  • Enhanced Server Stability
    CloudLinux uses its lightweight virtualization technology (LVE) to isolate each tenant on a shared hosting server, preventing any single user from consuming excessive resources and crashing the server for everyone else. This ensures consistent uptime and performance.
  • Improved Security with HardenedPHP and KernelCare
    CloudLinux offers HardenedPHP, which patches old and unsupported PHP versions against known vulnerabilities, and KernelCare, which provides live kernel patching without requiring server reboots. These features significantly enhance server security posture.
  • Resource Limit Management
    Administrators can set granular resource limits (CPU, memory, I/O, number of processes, etc.) per user account using LVE Manager. This makes it easy to manage shared hosting environments and ensure fair resource distribution among tenants.
  • CageFS File System Virtualization
    CageFS creates a virtualized file system for each user, preventing them from seeing other users on the server, viewing sensitive configuration files, or exploiting server vulnerabilities. This adds an important layer of isolation and security.
  • Wide Compatibility with Hosting Panels
    CloudLinux integrates seamlessly with popular hosting control panels such as cPanel, Plesk, and DirectAdmin, making it straightforward for hosting providers to adopt without overhauling their existing infrastructure or workflows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Additional Licensing Cost
    CloudLinux requires a paid monthly or annual license on top of the base server cost. For smaller hosting providers or individual server owners, this additional expense can add up and may not always be justifiable compared to free alternatives.
  • Limited to CentOS/RHEL-Based Systems
    CloudLinux is built on top of RHEL/CentOS and does not support other Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Debian. This limits its adoption for hosting providers who prefer or already run non-RHEL-based environments.
  • Learning Curve for Configuration
    While CloudLinux provides powerful resource management tools, properly configuring LVE limits, CageFS, PHP Selector, and other features requires a solid understanding of the platform. Misconfiguration can lead to users being unnecessarily restricted or resources being poorly allocated.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The additional layers of virtualization, resource monitoring, and file system isolation introduced by CloudLinux can impose a slight performance overhead on the server compared to running a bare, unmodified Linux distribution without these controls.
  • Dependency on CloudLinux Ecosystem
    Adopting CloudLinux means relying on their ecosystem for kernel updates, PHP patches, and security fixes. If the company experiences delays in releasing patches or changes its pricing/licensing model, hosting providers may find themselves locked into a dependency that is difficult to migrate away from.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Platform.sh
CloudLinux

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Platform.sh is regarded as a reliable and flexible hosting solution, particularly beneficial for businesses and teams that need advanced development workflows and infrastructure management. It can significantly streamline operations for development teams working in a collaborative environment.

Why this product is good

  • Platform.sh is considered a strong choice for developers and teams who require a robust, scalable, and efficient cloud hosting solution. It offers features like automated deployments, vertical scaling, and a comprehensive DevOps workflow. The platform provides tools for continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD), which can simplify the process of managing complex applications. Its ability to support multiple programming languages and frameworks also makes it versatile for various types of projects.

Recommended for

    Platform.sh is especially recommended for medium to large enterprises, digital agencies, and development teams looking to streamline their deployment processes and infrastructure management. It's also suitable for projects that require multi-cloud support and high levels of customization and scalability.

Overall verdict

  • CloudLinux is a well-regarded, mature Linux OS distribution and toolset specifically designed for shared hosting and multi-tenant server environments, offering strong isolation, resource management, and security features that make it a solid choice for hosting providers.

Why this product is good

  • Provides LVE (Lightweight Virtual Environment) technology for per-tenant resource isolation, preventing 'bad neighbor' effects on shared servers
  • Enhances server stability and security by isolating users so that one account's issues (crashes, resource spikes) don't affect others
  • Offers extended lifecycle support (longer than standard CentOS/RHEL support windows), which is valuable for legacy systems
  • Includes tools like CloudLinux OS Shield, Imunify360 integration, and hardened kernel options for improved security
  • Compatible with popular control panels like cPanel and Plesk, making it easy to integrate into existing hosting stacks
  • Backed by an established company with a long track record in the hosting industry and responsive support
  • Offers granular control over CPU, memory, I/O, and other resources per user account
  • Provides PHP Selector and multiple PHP version support, useful for hosting providers serving diverse client needs

Recommended for

  • Web hosting companies running shared or reseller hosting environments
  • Hosting providers needing to isolate customer accounts on the same physical server
  • Businesses requiring extended OS support lifecycles beyond standard RHEL/CentOS EOL dates
  • Enterprises using cPanel or Plesk that want tighter security and resource control
  • Hosting companies looking to reduce support tickets caused by noisy-neighbor resource contention
  • IT teams managing multi-tenant infrastructure who need governance and monitoring tools built into the OS layer

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Platform.sh 2 videos + Add
CloudLinux 3 videos + Add

Try new technologies and architectures | Platform.sh Demo

More videos

  • - ezConf 17 - ezPlatform on Platform.sh

When To Use Cloudlinux On Your Virtual Private Server (VPS)

More videos

  • - CloudLinux OS+ in a minute: Explore Features
  • - How CloudLinux Plans to Keep CentOS 6 Alive

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Platform.sh
CloudLinux
96% 96%
4% 4%
94% 94%
6% 6%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Platform.sh and CloudLinux. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Platform.sh no reviews yet
CloudLinux no reviews yet
  • Top 10 Node JS Hosting Companies
    blog.back4app.com · Oct 2021

    Infrastructure Management — Platform.sh gives you infrastructure management with the help of PaaS or “Platform as a Service”. This ensures that all the features related to management are either coded into the backend...

We have no reviews of CloudLinux yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Platform.sh 36 mentions
CloudLinux 0 mentions
  • Dev Challenge: A Soroban Crowdfactoring dApp
    I have been participated in other Soroban challenges such as Sorobanathon and Sorobounties Spectacular, but this challenge has been different. I have improved my react skills and I've learned how to integrate Backend and Frontend using... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • How much RAM for 20+ Drupal sites?
    You wrote get a 20G medium hosting package from platform.sh, did you mean 2G? Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Platform.sh vs Pantheon
    I personally *like* platform.sh better as a development tool but it's hard to make a strong objective case one way or the other. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking CloudLinux since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Platform.sh and CloudLinux

When comparing Platform.sh and CloudLinux, you can also consider the following products.