Pipedrive VS Steel Bank Common Lisp

Pipedrive Reviews

1. Pieter Jan    

   Co-founder at Vizito | almost 2 years ago
   The best CRM for our SaaS business

   Pipedrive has made our business much more efficient in following up deals. Keep track of deals, meetings, mails and phone calls all in one place. We can quickly follow up on offers and used Pipedrive's automations and API to integrate our Vizito trials directly into Pipedrive.

   It offers the most flexibility while maintaining an easy-to-use interface and their support is superb!

   Keep up the great work!

   🏁 Competitors: HubSpot CRM, Teamleader

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Quick and easy|Stable|Easy integration|Api integration|Rest api|Cost-efficient
2. jeet998    

   Chief Manager at Entab Infotech Pvt Ltd | over 4 years ago
   Best CRM Software: PipeDrive

   All alternatives are good but we prefer Pipedrive because of its great customization and most fit for company/business development.

Steel Bank Common Lisp Reviews

Pipedrive mentions (2)

• Why doesn't Microsoft have a better CRM product...?

  I feel like Microsoft could offer a more robust CRM than what's present with 'Contacts' under Outlook, and pretty easily. Something like Pipedrive... I mean it could syncronize all the datapoints that local Microsoft programs already have access to: mail, contacts, projects, teams, and LinkedIn. Source: over 1 year ago

• Building Reach in Public

  Pipedrive → our CRM for tracking leads, tasks, conversations, and deals. We chose Pipedrive because it does a good job of providing an intuitive and relatively simple CRM while still having enough features to track our sales conversations. Pricing is accessible. Source: over 2 years ago

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

• Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed

  Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• A few newbie questions about lisp

  Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: 12 months ago

• [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)

  That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago

• Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`

  I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago

• Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid

  > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago