
PlateJoy
Sage Project
Mealviser
No Meat Today
The Scientific Meal Planner
Chomp Food & Nutrition Database
Fuel
Simple, personalized nutrition 🍓📊

Exercise dataset for fitness apps: transparent background, animations, no subscription

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Pinto seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | pinto.co | repdb.co |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Pinto yet.
RepDB is a one-time-purchase exercise dataset with animations for developers building fitness and workout apps — not a subscription, not a rate-limited API. You download the data once and own it: JSON (and SQLite on the higher tier), WebP images, and full EN/DE/ES translations, with no...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
1974 Ford Pinto Wagon Full Drive and Review!
More videos
No RepDB videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Pinto and RepDB.
RepDB's answer:
RepDB is sold as a one-time download, not a metered API — you own the JSON/SQLite data and WebP images outright, with no rate limits, no per-request billing, and no risk of the vendor cutting off access. It's also the only dataset in this space with EN/DE/ES translations, transparent (alpha-channel) images with no watermark, muscle-group highlighting, safety/goal tags, and looping animations on the higher tier.
RepDB's answer:
RepDB grew out of a consumer workout app its creator was building solo. Sourcing exercise images and data meant either paying for a subscription API with usage caps and no caching rights, or producing everything from scratch. The illustrated, multi-language dataset was built for us first, then split out as its own product once it became clear other indie developers had the same problem and preferred to buy the data outright rather than rent it through an API.
RepDB's answer:
Most alternatives are subscription APIs — you pay monthly, you're capped on requests, and ExerciseDB's terms of use explicitly forbid caching or storing the data at all, so every image render is a live paid API call. RepDB is the opposite: pay once, download the files, self-host with zero ongoing dependency. It's also the only option offering true DE/ES localization and transparent images instead of a white box behind every exercise.
RepDB's answer:
Solo developers and small teams building fitness or workout-tracking apps (iOS, Android, web) who need licensed exercise images and structured exercise data, but don't want to build their own media pipeline or depend on a rate-limited third-party API.
Share your experience with using Pinto and RepDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


This might be complicated but could be a gold mine for someone who built it because large stores would pay for it. I found a company that does this for only food products their site is pinto.co ... But I was thinking more general than... Source: about 5 years ago
Tracking RepDB since Jul 2026.
When comparing Pinto and RepDB, you can also consider the following products.

Beautiful visualization of nutritional facts 🍟🍉🌮
Compare Sage Project to Pinto or RepDB:


Free meal plans optimally balanced for health and longevity
Compare The Scientific Meal Planner to Pinto or RepDB:

API for grocery products, branded foods, & raw ingredients.
Compare Chomp Food & Nutrition Database to Pinto or RepDB: