Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PingPlotter VS whatmask

Compare PingPlotter VS whatmask and see what are their differences

PingPlotter logo PingPlotter

PingPlotter is a troubleshooting tool that helps IT professionals and neophytes identify, diagnose, and resolve network issues.

whatmask logo whatmask

Whatmask is a small C program that will help you with network settings and subnet calculations.
  • PingPlotter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-13
  • whatmask Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-10

PingPlotter features and specs

  • Detailed Network Diagnostics
    PingPlotter provides advanced network diagnostics by visualizing latency and packet loss over time, helping identify problematic areas in the network.
  • Historical Data
    The tool allows users to save and review historical data, which is invaluable for troubleshooting intermittent network issues that are not easily reproducible.
  • Ease of Use
    PingPlotter offers an easy-to-use interface that makes it accessible even for users who aren't network experts, allowing them to quickly start diagnosing issues.
  • Customizable Alerts
    Users can set up customizable alerts to notify them when latency or packet loss exceeds certain thresholds, providing timely insights into network performance issues.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    PingPlotter is available on Windows, Mac, and iOS, which offers flexibility for different types of users and environments.

Possible disadvantages of PingPlotter

  • Cost
    PingPlotter is not free, and the cost can be prohibitive for individuals or small businesses, especially for the Pro version which offers more advanced features.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running PingPlotter for extended periods can consume significant system resources, which might be a concern for users with lower-end hardware.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of PingPlotter has limited functionality, which may not be sufficient for diagnosing more complex network issues.
  • Learning Curve
    While the basic functions are user-friendly, some of the more advanced features and data interpretation can have a learning curve, requiring users to invest time to fully utilize the tool.
  • No Linux Support
    PingPlotter does not support Linux, which can be a drawback for network administrators working in a Linux-dominated environment.

whatmask features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Whatmask offers a straightforward and simple command-line interface, making it quick and easy to use for network administrators and those familiar with CLI.
  • Comprehensive Output
    The tool provides detailed information such as netmask, wildcard, network address, broadcast address, and number of usable hosts, which helps in understanding subnet configuration comprehensively.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Whatmask can be freely used, modified, and distributed, allowing users to tailor it to their specific needs or integrate it into other software.
  • Lightweight
    It is a lightweight utility with minimal dependencies, making it efficient in terms of resource usage and easy to install on various systems.

Possible disadvantages of whatmask

  • Limited Platform Availability
    Primarily geared towards Unix-like systems, its usability might be limited on non-Unix platforms, requiring workarounds or substitutes for users on those systems.
  • Lack of GUI
    Whatmask lacks a graphical user interface, which might not be ideal for users who prefer visual representations or who are uncomfortable using command-line tools.
  • Specific Use Case
    The tool is specialized for subnet calculations and might not fulfill broader networking needs such as network diagnostics or comprehensive network management tasks.
  • Learning Curve
    Users who are not familiar with networking concepts might find it challenging to interpret the detailed subnet information without prior knowledge.

Analysis of PingPlotter

Overall verdict

  • PingPlotter is generally regarded as a good choice for network monitoring and troubleshooting, especially for users who need detailed visibility into the performance and health of their network connections.

Why this product is good

  • PingPlotter is considered a reliable network monitoring tool because it provides detailed insights into network performance and helps identify the location and nature of connectivity issues. It offers a user-friendly interface with comprehensive graphical representations of network data, making it easier to diagnose problems. Additionally, it supports both live monitoring and historical data analysis, which is beneficial for ongoing network management.

Recommended for

    PingPlotter is recommended for IT professionals, network administrators, and any users who need to maintain network reliability and optimal performance. It is also suitable for remote workers experiencing connectivity issues and gamers who require low-latency connections.

PingPlotter videos

Analyzing PingPlotter Data

More videos:

  • Review - Use PingPlotter to identify poor QoS or intermittent connectivity issues.
  • Tutorial - How to Use PingPlotter to Dignose Server Network Issues

whatmask videos

No whatmask videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PingPlotter and whatmask)
Monitoring Tools
72 72%
28% 28
Security
0 0%
100% 100
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
OS & Utilities
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PingPlotter and whatmask. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PingPlotter seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PingPlotter mentions (2)

  • Understanding missed attestations, understanding low effectiveness and improving your setup
    Once you have those in place, there is little more you can do to help. There might be some marginal benefits in connecting with more peers at the cost of higher resources usage, especially bandwidth. Under normal circumstances, the default peers count from your clients should be good. Monitoring Internet quality with tools like those from pingman can help pinpoint the cause of some of these missed attestations if... Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Packet Loss with PingPlotter
    I'm attempting to use PingPlotter to find the problem but I'm fairly new with it - The Packet Loss is occurring on IP 192.168.1.1 while testing 8.8.8.8, pingman.com, google.com, akamai.com however it does not show any PL for www.google.com. Source: over 4 years ago

whatmask mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of whatmask yet. Tracking of whatmask recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PingPlotter and whatmask, you can also consider the following products

FileZilla - FileZilla is an FTP, or file transfer protocol, client. It lets individuals transfer single files or batches to a web server. For many years, FTP was the standard for website design. Read more about FileZilla.

ipcalc - IP Calculator. ipcalc takes an IP address and netmask and calculates the resulting broadcast, network, Cisco wildcard mask, and host range. By giving a second netmask, you can design subnets and supernets....

PuTTY - Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

ship.sh - ๐Ÿšข ๐ŸŒŠ A simple, handy network addressing multitool ๐Ÿ”Ž with plenty of features.

Beyond Compare - Beyond Compare allows you to compare files and folders.

LanCalculator - LanCalculator - IP Subnet Calculator for IPv4/IPv6 Networks - LizardSystems