Software Alternatives & Startups

Ping Identity VS SplitSecure

Compare Ping Identity VS SplitSecure and see what are their differences

Ping Identity

Ping Identity provides cloud-based, single sign-on and identity management solutions with their SAML SSO.

Rating
0 reviews
SplitSecure

SplitSecure protects sensitive accounts with no single point of failure. Easy setup, seamless access, and enterprise-grade security that just works.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Identity And Access Management popularity
99% vs 1%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 4

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Ping Identity
SplitSecure
Website pingidentity.com splitsecure.com
Pricing
Company Startup from the United States · 10 - 19 employees
Listed in

About Ping Identity and SplitSecure

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Ping Identity
SplitSecure

No description of Ping Identity yet.

Split Secure is a security solution that manages "secrets" (such as passwords, credentials, encryption keys, etc.) by splitting them across multiple devices, rather than storing them in a single vault. This approach means no single device ever holds the complete secret, which significantly...

Read more about SplitSecure

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Ping Identity 5 features
SplitSecure 5 features
  • Comprehensive Identity Management
    Ping Identity provides a wide range of identity management solutions, including single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), and API security, making it a complete package for enterprise identity management.
  • Scalability
    It is designed to scale efficiently with the growth of an organization, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises.
  • Strong Security Features
    Ping Identity includes robust security features such as risk-based authentication, adaptive authentication, and threat detection capabilities.
  • User Experience
    The platform focuses on delivering seamless user experiences with features like password-less authentication and frictionless SSO across multiple applications.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It offers extensive integration capabilities with a wide range of applications, both on-premises and cloud-based, including popular SaaS providers.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity
    Given the comprehensive nature of its features, Ping Identity can be complex to implement and may require specialized knowledge and expertise.
  • Cost
    The extensive range of features and scalability come at a cost, which might be prohibitive for smaller businesses with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its sophisticated features, there is a steep learning curve for administrators and users who are new to the platform.
  • Customization
    While highly capable, customization for specific needs might require significant effort and sometimes additional support from Ping Identity.
  • Support Dependency
    Organizations may find themselves reliant on Ping Identity's support services for troubleshooting and maintenance, which could lead to higher ongoing costs.
  • Cost Sharing Model
    SplitSecure allows users to split insurance or protection costs with others, potentially making coverage more affordable for individuals who might not otherwise purchase standalone protection plans.
  • Simplified Sign-up Process
    The platform is designed to streamline the process of obtaining coverage, reducing paperwork and administrative burden compared to traditional insurance providers.
  • Flexible Coverage Options
    Users may have access to a range of coverage options tailored to different needs, allowing for more personalized protection plans.
  • Digital-First Approach
    Being an online platform, SplitSecure likely offers convenient digital access to policies, claims, and account management without needing in-person visits.
  • Potential for Community-Based Savings
    The split-cost model could foster a sense of shared responsibility and community savings, which may appeal to cost-conscious consumers.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Ping Identity
SplitSecure

Overall verdict

  • Ping Identity is generally considered a good option for identity and access management solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Ping Identity is known for its robust security features, flexible deployment options, and comprehensive identity management capabilities. It offers a range of services including single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and API security, which are appreciated by many enterprises. It also supports a wide variety of integrations and has a strong reputation for reliability and customer service.

Recommended for

    Ping Identity is well-suited for medium to large enterprises looking for scalable identity solutions, especially those wanting to enhance their security posture, achieve regulatory compliance, or improve the user experience with smoother access management.

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified, up-to-date information about SplitSecure (splitsecure.com), so I can't confirm whether it's good or reliable. I'd recommend researching independent reviews, checking company registration details, reading their terms of service, and looking for verified user feedback before using or trusting this service, especially if it involves financial transactions or shared payments.

Why this product is good

  • I don't have specific data on this product's features, pricing, or reputation to verify its quality.
  • Unverified or lesser-known financial/security services can carry risks, so due diligence is essential.
  • Checking third-party review sites, Better Business Bureau ratings, or Trustpilot could provide more reliable insight.
  • Confirming security certifications (like SSL, PCI compliance if handling payments) is important for any 'secure' branded service.

Recommended for

  • Users willing to conduct their own thorough research before committing
  • Those who prioritize checking independent reviews and business legitimacy first
  • Not recommended for immediate use without verification given the lack of confirmed information

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Ping Identity 2 videos + Add
SplitSecure 0 videos + Add

Okta vs. Ping Identity - Which Stock to Buy? Identity and Access Management (IAM) Cloud Stocks

More videos

  • - Stocks Close Strong; Vertex, Ping Identity, ResMed Clear Buy Points

No SplitSecure videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Ping Identity
SplitSecure
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Ping Identity and SplitSecure.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

SplitSecure's answer:

Enterprise grade access control that is easily-usable by small businesses, MSPs, MSSPs and any organisation with a need for access management.

What makes your product unique?

SplitSecure's answer:

SplitSecure is based on a novel protocol leveraging Shamir's Secret Sharing, which enables security-by-default for both human and AI workflows.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

SplitSecure's answer:

Deploying SplitSecure for the first time typically takes about 30 minutes. It does not require special training and any engineer or IT technician can do it. We support bulk enrollment for using via SSO and IAM integration, as well as bulk enrollment for protected resources via terraform and other common tools. SplitSecure is Easily the lowest cost PAM solution on the market and the easiest to operate.

What's the story behind your product?

SplitSecure's answer:

Founded in 2024 by CEO Tristan Morris in Sunnyvale, California, SplitSecure was created with a mission to redesign enterprise access management by focusing control on the actions being executed rather than just the identity of the user. SplitSecure closed a $4.5 million Seed funding round with backing from investors like the Berkeley SkyDeck Fund in Q4 2025, theniIn January 2026, SplitSecure officially launched out of stealth mode, introducing its patented S2 algorithm which is a cryptographic tool based on Shamir’s Secret Sharing that splits credentials across multiple devices so secrets are never stored in a single place. SplitSecure is now available on the Apple App Store, and actively secures critical infrastructure for both human and AI-automated enterprise workflows

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

SplitSecure's answer:

SplitSecure is based on the S2 algorithm, a patented secret-splitting algorithm based on Shamir's Secret Sharing. The S2 algorithm makes it possible to split secrets (like credentials and keys) across multiple devices, such that no device ever persists the secret, and the secret does not have to be exposed to be used.

Because the secrets are never persisted anywhere, an attacker cannot extract them by compromising a single device or conducting a phishing attack against a single employee. Instead, they would have to compromise a critical mass of the entire storage network simultaneously, without being detected at any point in that process.

User comments

Share your experience with using Ping Identity and SplitSecure. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Ping Identity no reviews yet
SplitSecure no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of SplitSecure yet. Be the first one to post

Alternatives to Ping Identity and SplitSecure

When comparing Ping Identity and SplitSecure, you can also consider the following products.