Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Ping-API VS Codegrepper

Compare Ping-API VS Codegrepper and see what are their differences

Ping-API logo Ping-API

Automated API testing and monitoring.

Codegrepper logo Codegrepper

Codegrepper is a unique platform that provides Fake Rest API, which you can use for prototyping, testing, and many other purposes.
  • Ping-API Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-22
  • Codegrepper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-21

Ping-API features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Ping-API provides a user-friendly interface that makes setting up API monitoring quick and straightforward, even for users with limited technical expertise.
  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    Offers detailed monitoring capabilities that can track API uptime, response times, and performance metrics, ensuring that users get a clear picture of their API's health.
  • Customization
    Allows users to customize alert settings and notifications, giving them control over how they receive updates and information about their API's status.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other tools and services, allowing users to incorporate API monitoring into their existing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Ping-API

  • Pricing
    The service can be costly, especially for small businesses or individual developers, as the pricing model may not be as flexible for varied usage levels.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free tier offers limited features, which might not be sufficient for more demanding monitoring requirements.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    Users looking to use advanced features may face a steep learning curve, as these features could require more technical knowledge to implement effectively.
  • Support Responsiveness
    Some users have reported slower response times from customer support, which could delay issue resolution when encountering problems.

Codegrepper features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ping-API and Codegrepper)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
API Tools
76 76%
24% 24
Online Services
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Ping-API and Codegrepper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Ping-API and Codegrepper

Ping-API Reviews

15 BEST SoapUI Alternatives (2022 Update)
Ping-API is API testing allows to write test script in JavaScript and CoffeeScript to test your APIs. It allows inspecting HTTP API call with a complete request and response data. For any failures, the user gets a notification through email, slack or Hipchat.
Source: www.guru99.com

Codegrepper Reviews

We have no reviews of Codegrepper yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ping-API and Codegrepper, you can also consider the following products

Runscope - Log, monitor and measure your API usage to solve API problems fast.

JSON Server - Get a full fake REST API with zero coding in less than 30 seconds. For front-end developers who need a quick back-end for prototyping and mocking

Thunder Client - Rest API client for VS Code, lightweight Postman alternative

ReqRes - A hosted REST-API ready to respond to your AJAX requests.

LoadFocus - Cloud Testing Infrastructure | Cloud Testing Services and Tools for Websites & APIs.

JSON Placeholder - JSON Placeholder is a modern platform that provides you online REST API, which you can instantly use whenever you need any fake data.